Comparing Bio-efficacy of Liquid DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free Acid with DL-methionine in Broiler Chickens

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 102-108

  Mandal, A B ^a   Elangovan, A V ^a   Johri, T S ^a  

^a CENTRAL AVIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Broiler; Carcass Traits; DL methionine; Growth Performance; MHA FA

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS; GLYCINE MAX; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0842332835     PISSN: 10112367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2004.102     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
2. Boebel, K. P. and D. H. Baker. 1982. Efficacy of the calcium salt and free acid forms of methionine hydroxy analogue for chicks. Poult. Sc. 61:1167-1175.
3. Bertram, H. L., E. J. Van Weerden and J. B. Schutte. 1991. DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue compared: There is a difference in biological activity in broiler diets. Misset World Poultry vol. 7:2, 13, 15.
4. Brennan, J. J. 1998. Efficacy of liquid MHA-FA as compared to DL-methionine on performance and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Project No. 40351, Shur-Gain Agresearch, Canada (Source: Feed back facts & figures, Feed additives, Poultry 7, Degussa-Huls).
5. Christensen, A. C. and J. O. Anderson. 1980. Factors affecting efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue for chick fed practical diets. Poult. Sci. 59:2485-2491.
6. Danner, E. E. and W. Bessei. 2002. Effectiveness of liquid DL-methionine hydroxy analogue-free acid (DL-MHA-FA) compared to DL-methionine on performance of laying hens. Arch. Geflugelk 66:(3),97-101.
7. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42.
8. Greger, G. R., J. R. Couch and H. L. Ernst. 1968. Methionine hydroxy analogue and L-methionine in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 47:229-232.
9. Harms, R. H. and R. E. Buresh. 1985. Recent poult studies comparing methionine availability from various sources, In: Proceedings Florida Nutrition Conference, pp. 41-45 (Gainesville, University of Florida).
10. Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least square analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. Agric Research Service, United State, Deptt. of Agriculture.
11. Huyghebaert, G. and P. J. W. Van Schagen. 1989. Relative biopotency of methionine sources for broilers, as measured by means of a multi-exponential regression model, In: IRTA,Barcelona, Proceedings 7th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, loret de Mar, Spain.
12. Kirchgessner, M. and H. Steinhart. 1984. Biological effectiveness of DL-methionine-Na and DL-2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutyric acid with broilers. Archiv für Gefliigelkunde, 48:45-51.
13. Larbier, M. 1988. A comparative study on the digestibility of methionine hydroxy analogue (M.H.A.) and of DL-methionine on adult cocks, in: (Ed. Y. Yamada) Proceedings XVIII World's Poultry Congress, September 4-9, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 823-825 (Japanese Poultry Science Association).
14. Lemme, A., D. Hoehler, J. J. Brennan and P. F. Mannion. 2002. Relative Effectiveness of Methionine Hydroxy Analog Compared to DL-methionine in Broilers Chickens. Poult. Sci. 81:838-845.
15. Llames, C. R. and J. Fontaine. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Int. 77:1362-1402.
16. Lu, J. J., C. W. Huang and R. G. R. Chou. 2003. The effects of DL-Methionine hydroxyl analogue on growth performance, contents of serum amino acids and activities of digestive proteases in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:714-718.
17. Mannion, P. F. 1999. A comparison of the bioefficacy of diluted DL-methionine (65%) or liquid MHA-FA as compared to pure DL-methionine in broiler chicks. Report No. 03.53.99002, Queensland Poultry Research and Development Centre, Australia. (Source: Feed back facts & figures, Feed additives, Poultry 10, Degussa-Huls).
18. Naumann, C., R. Bassler, R Seibold and C. Barth. 1997. Methodenbuch Band III. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
19. Noll, S. L., P. E. Waibel, R. D. Cook and J. A. Witmer. 1984. Biopotency of methionine sources for young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 63:2458-2470.
20. Reid, B. L., A. Madrid and P. M. Maiorino. 1982. Relative biopotency of three methionine sources for laying hens. Poult. Sci. 61:726-730.
21. Romoser, G. L., P. L. Wright and R. B. Grainger. 1976. An evaluation of the L-methionine activity of the hydroxy analogue of methionine. Poult. Sci. 55:1099-1103.
22. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th Ed. Iowa State University press, Ames, Iowa.
23. Thomas, O. P., S. D. Crissey, E. H. Bossard and M. B. Soverns. 1983. An evaluation of DL-methionine and related compounds. Proceedings Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufactureres, 26-31.
24. Thomas, O. P., C. Tamplin, S. D. Crissey, E. H. Bossard and A. Zuckerman. 1991. An evaluation of methionine hydroxy analog free acid using a non linear (exponential) bioassay. Poult. Sci. 70:605-610.
25. Uzu, G. 1986. Nutritional efficacy of DL-methionine, D-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue acid in a corn soybean meal lupin diet, in: (M. Larbie) Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, August 24-28, Paris, France, pp. 612-615 (French Branch of WPSA).
26. Van Weerden, E. J., H. L. Bertram and J. B. Schutte. 1982. Comparison of DL-methionine, DL-methionine-Na, DL-methionine hydroxy analogue-Ca, and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid in broilers by using a crystalline amino acid diet. Poult. Sci. 61:1125-1130.
27. Van Weerden, E. J., J. B Schutte and H. L. Bertram. 1983. DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy free acid in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 62:1269-1274.
28. Waldroup, P. W., C. J. Mabray, J. R. Blackman, P. J. Slagter, R. J. Short and Z. R. Johnson. 1981. Effectiveness of the free acid of methionine hydroxy analogue as a methionine supplement in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 60:438-443.