Storm damage and long-term mortality in a semi-natural, temperate deciduous forest

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 188, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 197-210

  Wolf, Annett ^a   Møller, Peter Friis ^b   Bradshaw, Richard H W ^b   Bigler, Jaris ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Compositional change; Forest dynamics; Mortality factors; Non intervention forest; Storm damage; Wind throw

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GROWTH KINETICS; MONITORING; STORMS; WIND EFFECTS;

MORTALITY DATA;

FORESTRY;

DECIDUOUS FOREST; MORTALITY; STORM DAMAGE;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; JUTLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

ALNUS; BETULA; BETULACEAE; FAGUS; FRAXINUS; MALVACEAE; TILIA;

EID: 0842327989     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aaby, B., 1983. Forest development, soil genesis and human activity illustrated by pollen and hypha analysis of two neighbouring podzols in Draved Forest, Denmark. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse II 114, 1-114.
2. Andersen K.F. Gales and gale damage to forests, with special reference to the effects of the storm of 31st January 1953, in the north-east of Scotland. Forestry. 27:1954;97-121.
3. Bigler, J., 2002. Stormfald og dets betydning som dynamisk faktor for urørt skov i Danmark. Master Thesis. Department of Economics and Natural Resources, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
4. Brewer R., Merritt P.G. Wind throw and tree replacement in a climax beech-maple forest. Oikos. 30:1978;149-152.
5. Brzeziecki B., Kienast F. Classifying the life-history strategies of trees on the basis of the Grimian model. For. Ecol. Manage. 69:1994;167-187.
6. Cooper-Ellis S., Foster D.R., Carlton G., Lezberg A. Forest response to catastrophic wind: results from an experimental hurricane. Ecology. 80:1999;2683-2696.
7. Cruickshank J.G., Stephens N., Symons L.J. Report of the hurricane in Ireland on Saturday, 16 September 1961. Irish Naturalist's J. 14:1962;4-12.
8. Cutler D.F., Gasson P.E., Farmer M.C. The wind blown tree survey: analysis of results. Arboricult. J. 14:1990;265-286.
9. Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut, 1999. Rapport Orkanen over Danmark den 3, 4 December 1999. Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut.
10. Day W.R. Soil conditions which determine windthrow in forests. Forestry. 23:1950;90-95.
11. Dobbertin, M., Seifert, H., 2000. Erste Ergebnisse des Teilprojektes: Erfassung der Bestandesdaten und Schäden auf dem repräsentativen 4×4 km Sanasilva-Netz. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf.
12. Emborg J., Christensen M., Heilmann-Clausen J. The structure of Suserup Skov, a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manage. 126:2000;173-189.
13. Everham E.M. III, Brokaw N.V.L. Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot. Rev. 62:1996;113-185.
14. Falinski J.B. Uprooted trees, their distribution and influence in the primeval forest biotype. Vegetatio. 38:1978;175-183.
15. Falinski, J.B., 1986. Vegetation Dynamics in Temperate Lowland Primeval Forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. Falinski J.B. Succession, regeneration and fluctuation in the Bialowieza Forest (NE Poland). Vegetatio. 77:1988;115-128.
17. Fodgaard S. Stormfald gennem tiderne. Skoven. 3:2000;144-148.
18. Foster D.R. Species and stand response to catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. J. Ecol. 76:1988;135-151.
19. Gardiner B.A., Quine C.P. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage: a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds. For. Ecol. Manage. 135:2000;261-277.
20. Grayson, A.J., 1989. The 1987 storm: Impacts and responses. Forestry Commission Bulletin 87.
21. Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G., Hunt, R., 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology. Undwin Hyman, London.
22. Haase P. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction. J. Veg. Sci. 6:1995;575-582.
23. Ida H. Treefall gap disturbance in an old-growth beech forest in southwestern Japan by a catastrophic typhoon. J. Veg. Sci. 11:2000;825-832.
24. Iversen J. Pollenanalytischer Nachweis des Reliktencharakters eines jütischen Linden-Mischwaldes. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes Rübel in Zürich. 33:1958;137-144.
25. Iversen J. Retrogressive development of a forest ecosystem demonstrated by pollen diagrams from fossil mor. Oikos. 12(Suppl.):1969;35-49.
26. Kenkel N.C. Pattern of self-thinning in jack pine: testing the random mortality hypothesis. Ecology. 69:1988;1017-1024.
27. Kenkel N.C., Hoskins J.A., Hoskins W.D. Local competition in a naturally established jack pine stand. Can. J. Bot. 67:1989;2630-2635.
28. Kodrik J., Kodrik M. Statical stability and production of the beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) root system. Ekol. Brat. 18:1999;255-263.
29. Meyer, P., Balcar, P., Kölbel, M., Schulte, U., 1999. Dynamik der Strukturdiversität in Buchen-Naturwaldreservaten. Tagungsband der Sektion Waldbau im DVFF, Lippstadt.
30. Møller, P.F., 2000a. Vandet i skoven - hvordan får vi vandet tilbage til skoven? Belysning af afvandingens baggrund, omfang og naturmæssige betydning - med henblik på mulighederne for at opnå mere naturlige vandstandsforhold i de danske skove. Danmarks og Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Rapport 2000/62, 60 pp.
31. Møller P.F. Natur og forskning i Draved Skov i fortid, nutid og fremtid. Sønderjysk Månedsskrift. 4:2000;81-93.
32. Oliver C.D., Stephens E.P. Reconstruction of a mixed-species forest in central New England. Ecology. 58:1977;562-572.
33. Peltola H., Kellmäki S., Hassinen A., Granander M. Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 135:2000;143-153.
34. Peterken, G.F., 1996. Natural Woodlands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Peterson C.J. Damage and recovery of tree species after two different tornadoes in the same old growth forest: a comparison of infrequent wind disturbances. For. Ecol. Manage. 135:2000;237-252.
36. Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S., 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando.
37. Pontailler J.-Y., Faille A., Lemee G. Storms drive successional dynamics in natural forests: a case study in Fontainebleau forest (France). For. Ecol. Manage. 98:1997;1-15.
38. Prentice I.C., Sykes M.T., Cramer W. A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes. Ecol. Modell. 65:1993;51-70.
39. Quine, C., Coutts, M., Gardiner, B., Pyatt, G., 1995. Forest and wind: management to minimise damage. For. Comm. Bull. 114.
40. Remmert H. The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems: an overview. Ecol. Stud. 85:1991;1-21.
41. Ripley B.D. Modelling spatial pattern. J. R. Stat. Soc. 39:1977;172-212.
42. Ripley B.D. Tests of 'randomness' for spatial point patterns. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 41:1979;368-374.
43. Romme W.H., Everham E.H., Frelich L.E., Moritz M.A., Sparks R.E. Are large, infrequent disturbances qualitatively different from small, frequent disturbances? Ecosystems. 1:1998;524-534.
44. Runkle J.R. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology. 62:1981;1041-1051.
45. Runkle, J.R., 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. (Eds.), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 17-33.
46. Runkle J.R. Gap dynamics in an Ohio Acer-Fagus forest and speculations on the geography of disturbance. Can. J. For. Res. 20:1990;632-641.
47. Runkle J.R., Yetter T.C. Treefalls revisited: gap dynamics in the Southern Appalachians. Ecology. 68:1987;417-424.
48. Sitch S., Smith B., Prentice I.C., Arneth A., Bondeau A., Cramer W., Kaplan J.O., Levis S., Lucht W., Sykes M.T., Thonicke K., Venevsky S. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biol. 9:2003;161-185.
49. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry. Freeman, New York.
50. SPSS, 2001. SPSS CLIENT 10.1S, CDR, WIN SPSS ADV M, WIN REG MODELS, 2001.
51. Thomas, P., 2000. Trees: Their Natural History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A., 1964. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
53. Ulanova N.G. The effects of windthrow on forest at different spatial scales: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 135:2000;155-167.
54. Veblen, T.T., 1992. Regeneration dynamics. In: Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K., Veblen, T.T. (Eds.), Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 152-187.
55. Vera, F.W.M., 2000. Grazing Ecology and Forest History. CABI Publishing, Oxon.
56. Webb S.L. Contrasting windstorm consequences in two forests, Itasca State Park, Minnesota. Ecology. 70:1989;1167-1180.
57. Webb, S.L., 1999. Disturbance by wind in temperate-zone forests. In: Walker, L. (Ed.), Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 187-222.
58. Wolf, A., 2003. Tree dynamics in Draved Forest - A long-term study of a temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Economics and Natural Resources, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
59. Woods K.D. Dynamics in late-successional hemlock-hardwood forests over three decades. Ecology. 81:2000;110-126.