The farmer, the planner, and the local citizen in the dell: How collaborative groups plan for farmland preservation

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-34

  Koontz, Tomas M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Collaborative planning; Farmland preservation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; URBAN PLANNING; WATERSHEDS;

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

FARMS;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; BASIN MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING;

NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0842327907     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00081-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Blomquist, W., Schlager, E., 2002. Governing the watershed: interests and institutions. In: Proceedings of the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 21-24 March, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
2. Buckle L., Thomas-Buckle S. Placing environmental mediation in context: lessons from 'failed' mediations. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 6(1):1986;55-70.
3. Coglianese C. The limits of consensus: the environmental protection system in transition: toward a more desirable future. Environment. 41(3):1999;1-6.
4. Cortner H.J., Wallace M., Burke S., Moote M. Institutions matter: the need to address institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape Urban Plann. 40:1998;159-166.
5. Cortner, H.J., Moote, M.A., 1999. The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
6. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), 1994. The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
7. Hill MacKenzie, S., 1996. Integrated Resource Planning and Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
8. Imperial M. Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environ. Manage. 24(4):1999;449-465.
9. John, D., 1994. Civic Environmentalism: Alternatives to Regulation in States and Communities. CQ Press, Washington, DC.
10. Kenney D.S. Are community-based watershed groups really effective? Confronting the thorny issue of measuring success. Chronicle Commun. 3(2):1999;33-37.
11. King, G., Robert, K., Sidney, V., 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Koontz, T.M., Moore, E., 2000. Collaborative environmental management: fitting stakeholders to objectives. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Society and Natural Resource Management, June 2000, Bellingham, WA, USA.
13. Korfmacher K.S. What's the point of partnering? A case study of ecosystem management in the Darby Creek watershed. Am. Behav. Sci. 44(4):2000;548-564.
14. Korfmacher K.S. Invisible successes, visible failures: paradoxes of ecosystem management in the Albermarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study. Coastal Zone Manage. 26(3):1998;191-212.
15. Leach W.D., Pelkey N.W. Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 127(6):2001;378-385.
16. Lynn F.M. Citizen involvement in hazardous waste sites: two North Carolina success stories. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 7:1987;347-361.
17. Lynn F.M., Busenberg G.J. Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: what we know, what's left to discover. Risk Anal. 15(2):1995;147-162.
18. Meadowcroft J. Cooperative management regimes: collaborative problem-solving to implement sustainable development. Int. Negotiation. 4(2):1999;225-254.
19. Miles, M., Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
20. Moseley, C., KenCairn, B., 2000. Institutional problem solving or social change: the Applegate and Grand Canyon forest partnerships. In: Steps Toward Stewardship: Ponderosa Pine Ecosystem Restoration and Conservation, 24-26 April, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
21. Ohio Agricultural Statistics Service, 2000. US Department of Agriculture 1950, 1957 Census of Agriculture. 14 March, Columbus, OH, USA.
22. Ohio Department of Development, no date. Ohio County Profiles. Office of Strategic Research, Columbus, OH, USA.
23. Ohio State University Extension, 1998. Ohio Rural Zoning (Map). October, Columbus, OH, USA.
24. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Pierce, J., Doerkson, H., 1976. Citizen advisory committees: the impact of recruitment on representation and responsiveness. In: Pierce, J., Doerksen, H. (Eds.), Water Politics and Public Involvement. Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
26. Ross and Associates, 1991. Lessons Learned: The Pacific Northwest Hazardous Waste Council's Approach to Regional Coordination and Policy Development.
27. Sharp, J.S., Vinland, V., 2000. Rural and nonmetropolitan population change in Ohio, 1950 to 1998. Ohio Rural-Urban Interface Series: RU-1. The Data Center, Ohio State University, Department of Human and Community Resource Development ( http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~dataunit/ru-1/ru1_8.html ).
28. Steelman, T.A., Carmin, J., 2002. Community based watershed remediation: connecting organizational resources to social and substantive outcomes. In: Dianne, R. (Ed.), Toxic Waste and Environmental Policy in the 21st Century United States. McFarland Publishers, Jefferson, NC, pp. 145-178.
29. Wondolleck, J.M., Yaffee, S.L., 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons From Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
30. Yaffee, S.L., Phillips, A.F., Frentz, I.C., Hardy, P.W., Maleki, S.M., Thorpe, B.E., 1996. Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience. Island Press, Washington, DC.
31. Yin, R.K., 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, second ed. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.