MDCT of benign liver tumors and metastases

European Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2003, Pages

  Valette, Pierre Jean ^a   Pilleul, Frank ^a   Crombé Ternamian, Arielle ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLLIMATOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER ADENOMA; LIVER HEMANGIOMA; LIVER HYPERPLASIA; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS;

EID: 0842323877     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2129-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Spielman A, Nelson R (2003) Liver. In: Bonomo L, Foley DW, Imhof H, Rubin G (eds) Multidetector CT technology: advances in imaging techniques. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, pp 129-139
2. Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD (2000) Multiphase hepatic CT with multirow-detector CT scanners. AJR 175:679-685
3. Berland LL, Lee JY (1988) Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented CT. Invest Radiol 23:918-922
4. Awai K, Takasa K, Ohishi H (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of different concentrations of contast material at multidetector-row helical CT. Radiology 224:757-763
5. Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media: principles and rationale - vascular district. In: Bonomo L, Foley DW, Imhof H, Rubin G (eds) Multidetector CT technology: advances in imaging techniques. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, pp 27-38
6. Brink JA (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media: principles and rationale: body CT. Eur J Radiol 45:S53-S58
7. Prokop M (2003) General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol 45: S4-S10
8. Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP et al. (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20:379-397
9. Kim T, Federle MP, Baron RL et al. (2001) Discrimination of small hemangiomas from hypervascular malignant tumors smaller than 3 cm with three-phase helical CT. Radiology 219:699-706
10. Van Beers Be, Horsman Y, Sempoux C (2003) Scanner multi-detecteur face à l'IRM dans les tumeurs bénignes du foie. Eur J Radiol 84:445-456
11. Brancatelli G, Ferderle MP, Grazioli L et al. (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients. Radiology 219:61-68
12. Ba-Ssalamah A, Schima W, Schmook MT et al. (2002) Atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: imaging features of nonspecific and liver-specific MR contrast agents. AJR 179:1447-1456
13. Fabre M, Neyra M (1995) Role of fine-needle puncture in the diagnosis of a hepatic mass. Ann Pathol 15:380-387
14. Ruppert-Kohlmayr A, Uggowitzer M, Kugler C et al. (2001) Focal nodula hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma of the liver: differentiation with multiphasic helical CT. AJR 176:1493-1498
15. Vilgrain V (2003) Scanner multi detecteur face à l'IRM dans les tumeurs malignes du foie. Eur J Radiol 84:459-470
16. Paulson EK, McDermott VG, Keogan MT et al. (1998) Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. Radiology. 206:143-150
17. Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A, Guma A, Figueras J, Torras J, Serrano T (2001) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT. Radiology 218:55-60
18. Haider MA, Amitai, MM, Rappaport DC et al. (2002) Multidetector-row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (≤1.5 cm) liver metastases: Is thinner collimation better? Radiology 225:137-142
19. Kehagias D, Metafa A, Hatziioannou A et al. (2000) Comparison of CT, MRI and CT during arterial portography in the detection of malignant hepatic lesions. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1399-1403
20. Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee AJ et al. (2002) Small hypoattenuating lesions in the liver on single-phase helical CT in preoperative patients with gastric and colorectal cancer: prevalence, significance and differentiating features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:718-724