A note on the fisher ideal index decomposition for structural change in energy intensity

Energy Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 87-101

  Boyd, Gale A ^a   Roop, Joseph M ^b  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ECONOMICS; NUMBER THEORY; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ENERGY INTENSITY; FISHER IDEAL INDEX DECOMPOSITION;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

MARTES PENNANTI;

EID: 0842312304     PISSN: 01956574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No1-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andreassen, A., and C., Chentrens (1999). "Employment Outlook: 1998-2008 Input-Output 192-Order Documentation". Private communication
2. Ang, B. W. and F. Liu (2001). "A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation." Energy 26(6): 537-548.
3. Ang, B. W. and F. Zhang (2000). "A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies." Energy 25(12): 1149-1176.
4. Ang, B. W. and K. H. Choi (1997). "Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method." The Energy Journal 18(3): 59-73.
5. Boyd, G. A. and J. A. Laitner (2001). "Recent Trends in the U.S. Energy Intensity: An Index Number Analysis." International Association for Energy Economics Newsletter 2nd Quarter: 4-9.
6. Berndt, E. R., C. J. Morrison and G. C. Watkins (1981). "Dynamic Models of Energy Demand: An Assessment and Comparison." In Berndt, E. R., and B. C. Field (Eds.) Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
7. Boyd, G. A., J. F. McDonald, M. Ross, and D. Hanson. (1987). "Separating the Changing Composition of U.S. Manufacturing Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements: A Divisia Index Approach." The Energy Journal 8(2): 77-96.
8. Diewert, W. E. (1974). "Functional Forms for Revenue and Factor Requirements Functions," International Economic Review 15(1):119-130.
9. Diewert, W. E. (2001). The Consumer Price Index and Index Number Theory: A Survey Vancouver, Canada, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia. Web address: http://www.econ.ubc.ca/discpapers/dp0102.pdf
10. Energy Information Administration (1999). Annual Energy Review. U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, D.C.
11. Greening, L., W. Davis, L. Schipper and M. Khrushch (1997). "Comparison of six decomposition methods: Application to aggregate energy intensity for manufacturing in 10 OECD countries." Energy Economics 19(3): 375-390.
12. Lermit, Jonathan and Nigel Jollands (2001). Monitoring Energy Efficiency Performance in New Zealand: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework. Prepared for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority. September. Web address: http://www.energywise.co.nz
13. Myers, J. and L. Nakamura (1978). Savings Energy in Manufacturing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
14. Padfield Chris J. (2001). "The Canadian Decomposition Experience: From 10 to 54 Industries", paper presented at the 2001 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, Proceedings volume 1, July, pgs. 621-630.
15. Ross, M., P. Thimmapuram et al. (1993). Long-Term Industrial Energy Forecasting (LIEF) Model (18-Sector Version). Argonne National Laboratory. ANL/EAIS/TM-93
16. Sun, J. W. (1998a). "Accounting for energy use in China; 1984-94." Energy 23(10): 835-949.
17. Sun, J. W. (1998b). "Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model." Energy Economics 20(1): 85-100.
18. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (1989). Energy Conservation Trends: Understanding the Factors that Affect conservation Gains in the U. S. Economy. DOE/PE-0092. Washington, D. C.