Patterns of Spawning Habitat Selection and Suitability for Two Populations of Spring Chinook Salmon, with an Evaluation of Generic versus Site-Specific Suitability Criteria

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 89-97

  Mchugh, Peter ^a   Budy, Phaedra ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FLOW VELOCITY; GRAIN SIZE; HABITAT SELECTION; SALMONID; SPAWNING GROUND; WATER DEPTH;

ELK CREEK; IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; SULPHUR CREEK; UNITED STATES;

CERVUS ELAPHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0842307306     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T03-021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baltz, D. M. 1990. Autecology. Pages 582-607 in C. B. Shreck and P. B. Moyle, editors. Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
2. Baxter, C. V., and F. R. Hauer. 2000. Geomorphology, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1470-1481.
3. Baxter, J. S., and J. D. McPhail. 1999. The influence of redd site selection, groundwater upwelling, and over-winter incubation temperature on survival of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) from egg to alevin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 77:1233-1239.
4. Bjornn, T. C., and D. W. Reiser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Pages 83-138 in W. R. Meehan, editor. Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19, Bethesda, Maryland.
5. Bunte, K., and S. R. Abt. 2001. Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel-and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-74428, Fort Collins, Colorado.
6. Burnham, K. P., and D. A. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Elms-Cockrum, T. E. 2001. Salmon spawning ground surveys, 1999. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Pacific Salmon Treaty Program, IDFG 01 -10, Boise.
8. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.). 1999. ArcView 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, California.
9. Essington, T. E., P. W. Sorenson, and D. G. Paron. 1998. High rate of redd superimposition by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a Minnesota stream cannot be explained by habitat availability alone. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:2310-2316.
10. Geist, D. R. 2000. Hyporheic discharge of river water in fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning areas in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1647-1656.
11. Geist, D. R., and D. D. Dauble. 1998. Redd site selection and spawning habitat use by fall chinook salmon: the importance of geomorphic features in large rivers. Environmental Management 22:655-669.
12. Geist, D. R., J. Jones, C. J. Murray, and D. D. Dauble. 2000. Suitability criteria analyzed at the spatial scale of redd clusters improved estimates of fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning habitat use in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 1636-1646.
13. Guay, J. C., D. Boisclair, D. Rioux, M. Leclerc, M. Lapointe, and P. Legendre. 2000. Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:2065-2075.
14. Keeley, E. R., and P. A. Slaney. 1996. Quantitative measures of rearing and spawning habitat characteristics for stream-dwelling salmonids: guidelines for habitat restoration. Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Environment, Land, and Parks and Ministry of Forests, Watershed Restoration Project Report 4, Vancouver.
15. Knapp, R. A., and H. K. Preisler. 1999. Is it possible to predict habitat use by spawning salmonids? A test using California golden trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aguabonita). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:1576-1584.
16. Kondolf, G. M. 1997. Application of the pebble count: reflections on purpose, method, and variants. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:79-97.
17. Maki-Petays, A., A. Huusko, J. Erkinaro, and T. Muotko. 2002. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:218-228.
18. Milhous, R. T., M. A. Updike, and D. M. Schneider. 1989. Physical habitat simulation system reference manual, version II. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 89(16).
19. Montgomery, D. R., E. M. Beamer, G. R. Pess, and T. P. Quinn. 1999. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:377-387.
20. Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington. 1993. Channel classification, prediction of channel response, and assessment of channel condition. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Report TFW-SH10-93-002, Olympia.
21. Quinn, T. P., E. C. Volk, and A. P. Hendry. 1999. Natural otolith microstructure patterns reveal precise homing to natal incubation sites by sockeye salmon. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77:766-775.
22. Raleigh, R. F., W. J. Miller, and P. C. Nelson. 1986. Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: chinook salmon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82(10.122).
23. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS version 8.01. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
24. Shapiro and Associates. 2000. Final Bear Valley watershed analysis, Report for the Lowman Ranger District of Boise National Forest, Portland, Oregon.
25. Shirvell, C. S. 1989. Ability of PHABSIM to predict chinook salmon spawning habitat. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 3:277-289.
26. Thielke, J. 1985. A logistic regression approach for developing suitability-of-use functions for fish habitat. Pages 32-38 in F. W. Olson, R. G. White, and R. H. Hamre, editors. Proceedings of the symposium on small hydropower and fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Western Division and Bioengineering Section, Bethesda, Maryland.
27. Vronskii, B. B., and V. N. Leman. 1991. Spawning stations, hydrological regime, and survival of progeny in nests of chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus rshawytscha, in the Kamchatka River Basin. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 21:282-291.
28. Witzel, L. D., and H. R. MacCrimmon. 1983. Redd-site selection by brook trout and brown trout in southwestern Ontario streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 112:760-771.
29. Wolman, M. G. 1954. A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 35:951-956.