Acid aspiration prophylaxis in obstetrics in France: A comparative survey of 1998 vs. 1988 French practice

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 89-94

  Tourtier, J P ^a   Compain, M ^a   Petitjeans, F ^a   Villevieille, T ^a   Chevalier, J F ^a   Mercier, F J ^a   Benhamou, Dan ^a  

^a HÔPITAL ANTOINE BÉCLÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia conduction, spinal, epidural; Anti ulcer agents, antacids; Neuromuscular depolarizing agents, succinylcholine; Obstetric surgical procedures, delivery, obstetric, caesarean section

Indexed keywords

ANTACID AGENT; CIMETIDINE; FENTANYL; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; RANITIDINE; SUFENTANIL; SUXAMETHONIUM;

ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRICOID; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FRANCE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; REVIEW; TECHNIQUE;

ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANTACIDS; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; NEUROMUSCULAR NONDEPOLARIZING AGENTS; OBSTETRICS; PNEUMONIA, ASPIRATION; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUCCINYLCHOLINE;

EID: 0842305870     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021504002029     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Glosten B. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia, 5th edn. New York, USA: Churchill Livingstone, 2002: 2024-2068.
2. Benhamou D. French obstetric anaesthetists and acid aspiration prophylaxis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1993; 10: 27-32.
3. Clergue F, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Jougla E, Lienhart A, Laxenaire M. French survey of anesthesia in 1996. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1509-1520.
4. Soreide E, Holst-Larsen H, Steen PA. Acid aspiration syndrome prophylaxis in gynaecological and obstetric patients: a Norwegian survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 863-868.
5. Schneck H, Scheller M, Wagner R, von Hundelshausen B, Kochs E. Anaesthesia for cesarean section and acid aspiration prophylaxis: a German survey. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 63-66.
6. Papiernik E, Zeitlin J, Milligan DWA, et al. Variations in the organization of obstetric and neonatal intensive care in Europe. Prenat Neonat Med 1999; 4 (Suppl 1): 73-87.
7. Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 56-62.
8. Ezri T, Szmuk P, Stein A, Konichezky S, Hagai T, Geva D. Peripartum general anaesthesia without tracheal intubation: incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 421-426.
9. Wright PM, Allen RW, Moore J, Donnelly JP. Gastric emptying during lumbar extradural analgesia in labour: effect of fentanyl supplementation. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 248-251.
10. Kelly MC, Carabine UA, Hill DA, Mirakhur RK. A comparison of the effect of intrathecal and extradural fentanyl on gastric emptying in laboring women. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 834-838.
11. Michael S, Reilly CS. Policies for oral intake during labour: a survey of maternity units in England and Wales. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 1071-1073.
12. Breen TW, McNeil T, Dierenfield L. Obstetric anesthesia practice in Canada. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47: 1230-1242.
13. Hawkins JL, Gibbs CP, Martin-Salvaj G, Orleans M, Beaty B. Oral intake policies on labor and delivery: a national survey. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 449-451.
14. Kubli M, Scrutton MJ, Seed PT, O'Sullivan G. An evaluation of isotonic 'sport drinks' during labor. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 404-408
15. Scrutton MJ, Metcalfe GA, Lowy C, Seed PT, O'Sullivan G. Eating in labour, a randomised controlled trial assessing the risks and benefits. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 329-334.
16. Stamer UM, Messerschmidt A, Wulf H. Anaesthesia for caesarian section: a German survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 678-684.
17. Kluger MT, Willemsen G. Anti-aspiration prophylaxis in New Zealand: a national survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 70-77.
18. Thwaites AJ, Rice CP, Smith I. Rapid sequence induction: a questionnaire survey of its routine conduct and continued management during a failed intubation. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 376-381.
19. Palot M, Chalé JJ, Colladon B, et al. Anesthésies et analgésies pratiquées dans les maternités françaises. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1998; 17: 210-219.
20. Riley ET, Papasin J. Epidural catheter function during labor predicts anesthetic efficacy for subsequent cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002; 11: 81-84.
21. Deaths associated with anaesthesia. In: Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 1988-1990. London, UK: HMSO, 1994: 80-96.
22. Morris J, Cook TM. Rapid sequence induction: a national survey. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 1090-1097.
23. Benhamou D. Cricoid pressure is unnecessary in obstetric general anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995; 4: 30-33.
24. Brimacombe JR, Alison MB. Cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 414-425.
25. Maltby JR, Beriault MT. Science, pseudoscience and Sellick. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49: 443-447.
26. Laxenaire MC, Mertes PM. Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 549-558.