Computational gestalts and perception thresholds

Journal of Physiology Paris

Volumn 97, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 311-324

  Desolneux, Agnès ^a   Moisan, Lionel ^a   Morel, Jean Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Computer vision; Detection threshold; Gestalt theory; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; GEOMETRY; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; RETINA IMAGE; REVIEW; VISION;

EID: 0842303248     PISSN: 09284257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. d'Alès J.-P., Froment J., Morel J.-M. Reconstruction visuelle et généricité Intellectica. 1(28):1999;11-35.
2. Alvarez L., Gousseau Y., Morel J.-M. The size of objects in natural and artificial images. Adv. Imag. Electron Phys. 111:1999;167-242.
3. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psych. Rev. 61:1954;183-193.
4. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. Edges are the 'independent components' of natural scenes. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 9:1996.
5. Brunswik E., Kamiya J. Ecological cue-validity of 'proximity' and other Gestalt factors. Amer. J. Psychol. 66:1953;20-32.
6. Caselles V., Coll B., Morel J.-M. A Kanizsa programme. Prog. Nonlinear Different. Eqs. Applicat. 25:1996;35-55.
7. Desolneux A., Moisan L., Morel J.-M. Meaningful alignments. Int. J. Comp. Vision. 40(1):2000;7-23.
8. Desolneux A., Moisan L., Morel J.-M. Edge detection by helmholtz principle. J. Math. Imag. Vision. 14(3):2001;271-284.
9. A. Desolneux, L. Moisan, J.-M. Morel, Maximal meaningful events and applications to image analysis, preprint CMLA no 2000-22, submitted. Available from < http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/Cmla/Publications/
10. A. Desolneux, L. Moisan, J.-M. Morel, Partial gestalts, preprint CMLA no 2001-22, submitted. Available from < http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/Cmla/ Publications/
11. Geisler W.S., Perry J.S., Super B.J., Gallogly D.P. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Res. 41:2001;711-724.
12. Guy G., Medioni G. Inferring global perceptual contours from local features. Int. J. Comp. Vision. 20(1):1996;113-133.
13. Horn B.K. Robot Vision. 1987;MIT Press.
14. Bergen J.R., Julesz B. Textons, the fundamental elements of preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 62(6):1983;1619-1645.
15. G. Kanisza, Grammatica del Vedere, II Mulino, Bologna, 1980. Traduction française par Antonin Chambolle (ci-dessous).
16. G. Kanizsa, La Grammaire du Voir, Editions Diderot, arts et sciences, 1997.
17. G. Kanisza, Vedere e pensare, II Mulino, Bologna, 1991.
18. Kanisza G. Organization in Vision. 1979;Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19. M. Kass, A. Witkin, D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: active contour models, in: 1st Intenational Computer Vision Conference IEEE 777, 1987.
20. Kiryati N., Eldar Y., Bruckstein A.M. A probabilistic Hough transform. Pattern Recog. 24(4):1991;303-316.
21. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. 1935;Harcourt and Brace, New York.
22. Krüger N., Wörgötter F. Multi-modal estimation of collinearity and parallelism in natural image sequences. Network Comput. Neural Syst. 13(4):2002;553-576.
23. Lowe D. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. 1985;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Marr D. Vision. 1982;Freeman and co.
25. Metzger W. Gesetze des Sehens. 1975;Waldemar Kramer.
26. Montanari U. On the optimal detection of curves in noisy pictures. CACM. 14(5):1971;335-345.
27. Olshausen B.A., Field D.J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature. 381(6583):1996;607-609.
28. A. Sha'Ashua, S. Ullman, Structural saliency: the detection of globally salient structures using a locally connected network, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision, 1988, pp. 321-327.
29. Shaked D., Yaron O., Kiryati N. Deriving stopping rules for the probabilistic hough transform by sequential analysis. Comp. Vision Image Understand. 63(3):1996;512-526.
30. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:1948;379-423. and 623-656.
31. Sigman M., Cecchi G.A., Gilbert C.D., Magnasco M.O. On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 98(4):2001;1935-1940.
32. Stewart C.V. MINPRAN: a new robust estimator for computer vision. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 17:1995;925-938.
33. Wertheimer M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre der Gestalt II. Psychol. Forsch. 4:1923;301-350. Translation published as Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms, in: W. Ellis, A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1938, pp. 71-88.
34. Wertheimer M. Laws of Organisation in Perceptual Forms. 1935;Harcourt & Brace & Javanowitch, London.
35. Wuescher D.M., Boyer K.L. Robust contour decomposition using constant curvature criterion. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13(1):1991;41-51.