Somatosensory conduction velocity distribution of median nerve middle palmar digital component

International Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 153-165

  Dalkilic, Nizamettin ^a,b   Yuruten, Betigul ^a   Ilhan, Barkin ^a  

^a Meram Medical Faculty   (Turkey)

^b SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Collision technique; Compound action potential; Conduction velocity distribution; Digital nerve; Distribution; Median nerve

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND PALM; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; INNERVATION; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE CELL; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE FIBER; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REACTION TIME; SENSORY NERVE; TIME; WRIST;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; MUSCLE FIBERS; NEURAL CONDUCTION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0842291440     PISSN: 00207454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207450490269426     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barker, A. T., Brown B. H., & Freeston, I. L. (1979). Determination of the distribution of conduction velocities in human nerve trunks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-26, 76-81.
2. Bühler, R., Magistris, M. R., Truffert, A., Hess, C. W., & Rösler, K. M. (2001). The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 938-949.
3. Caccia, M. R., Osio, M., Dezuanni, E., Bevilacqua, M., Bertora, P. L., Salvaggio, A., Mangoni, A., & Norbiato, G. (1992). Nerve conduction velocity distribution in normal subjects and in diabetic patients without clinical signs of neuropathy II. Sensory nerve. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 32, 411-416.
4. Caccia, M. R., Salvaggio, A., Dezuanni, E., Osio, M., Bevilacqua, M., Norbiato, G., & Mangoni A. (1993). An electrophysiological method to assess the distribution of the sensory propagation velocity of the digital nerve in normal and diabetic subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 89, 88-94.
5. Cummins, K. L., Dorfman, L. J., & Perkel, D. H. (1979). Nerve fiber conduction-velocity distribution. II. Estimation based on two compound action potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 647-658.
6. Dalkiliç, N., & Pehlivan F. (2002a). Comparison of fiber diameter distribution deduced by modelling compound action potentials recorded by extracellular and suction techniques. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1011-1024.
7. Dalkiliç, N., & Pehlivan F. (2002b). A correction procedure for the volume conductor effect in the compound action potential recorded from isolated nerve trunk. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1011-1024.
8. Gasser, H. S., & Grundfest, H. (1939). Axon diameters in relation to the spike dimensions and the conduction velocity in mammalian a fibers. Journal of Physiology, 127, 393-414.
9. Gu, D., Gander, R. E., & Crichlow E. C. (1996). Determination of nerve conduction velocity distribution from sampled compound action potential signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45, 829-838.
10. Harayama, H., Shinozawa, K., Kondo, H., & Miyatake, T. (1991). A new method to measure the distribution of motor conduction velocity in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 81, 323-331
11. Hirose, G., Tsuchitani, Y., & Huang, J. (1986). A new method for estimation of nerve conduction velocity distribution in the frequency domain. Clinical Neurophysiology, 63, 192-202.
12. Hopf, H. C. (1962). Untersuchungen über die Unterschiede in der Leitgeschwindigkeit motorische Nervenfasern beim Menschen. Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilk., 183, 579-588.
13. Ingram, D. A., Davis, G. R., & Swash, M. (1987a). The double collision technique: A new method for measurement of the motor nerve refractory period distribution in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 225-234.
14. Ingram, D. A., Davis G. R., & Swash, M. (1987b). Motor nerve conduction velocity distribution in man: Results of a new computer-based Collision technique. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 235-243.
15. Kimura, J. (1976). Collision technique: Physiologic block of nerve impulses in studies of motor nerve conduction velocity. Neurology, 26, 680-682.
16. Morita, G., Tu, Y. X., Okajima, Y., Honda, S., & Tomita, Y. (2002). Estimation of the conduction velocity distribution of human sensory nerve fibers. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 12, 37-43.
17. Papadopoulou, F. A., & Panas, S. M. (1999). Bispectral de-noising of the compound action potential for estimation of the nerve conduction velocity distribution. Medical Engineering & Physics, 21, 499-505.
18. Pehlivan, F. (1997). Biyofizik, Ankara: Hacettepe-Tas Kitapcilik.
19. Ruijten, M. W. M. M., Salle, H. J. A., & Kingma, R. (1993). Comparison of two techniques to mea sure the motor nerve conduction velocity distribution. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 89, 375-381.
20. Schoonhoven, R., & Stegeman, D. F. (1991). Models and analysis of compound nerve action potentials. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 19, 47-111.
21. Tan, U. (1993). Sensory nerve conduction velocities are higher on the left than the right hand and motor conduction is faster on the right than left in right-handed normal. International Journal of Neuroscience, 73, 85-91.
22. Tu, Y. X., Wernsdorfer, A., Honda, S., & Tomita, Y. (1977). Estimation of conduction velocity distribution by Regularized-Least-Square method. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering. 44, 1102-1106.