Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 155, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 733-740

  Brânzei, Rodica ^a   Dimitrov, Dinko ^b   Tijs, Stef ^c  

^a ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compromise values of type and of type; Cooperative games; Core; Fuzzy coalitions; Fuzzy games; Game theory; Hypercubes; Path solutions; Weber set

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FUZZY SETS; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; THEOREM PROVING; VECTORS;

COMPROMISE VALUES OF Σ-TYPE AND OF Τ-TYPE; COOPERATIVE GAMES; CORE; FUZZY COALITIONS; FUZZY GAMES; HYPERCUBES; PATH SOLUTIONS; WEBER SET;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0842290798     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00879-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Aubin J.P. Coeur et valeur des jeux flous à paiements latéraux. Comptes Rendus de l' Academie des Sciences Paris A. 279:1974;891-894.
2. Aubin J.P. Cooperative fuzzy games. Mathematics of Operations Research. 6:1981;1-13.
3. Bennett E., Wooders M. Income distribution and firm formation. Journal of Comparative Economics. 3:1979;304-317.
4. Bergantiños G., Massó J. Notes on a new compromise value: The. χ -value Optimization. 38:1996;277-286.
5. Brânzei, R., Dimitrov, D., Tijs, S.H., in press. Convex fuzzy games and participation monotonic allocation schemes, CentER Discussion Paper 2002-13, Tilburg University, The Netherlands, Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
6. Butnariu D. Fuzzy games: A description of the concept. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1:1978;181-192.
7. Butnariu D., Klement E.P. Triangular Norm-Based Measures and Games with Fuzzy Coalitions. 1993;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
8. Driessen T., Tijs S.H. The. τ -value, the core and semiconvex games International Journal of Game Theory. 14:1985;229-247.
9. Gerard-Varet L.A., Zamir S. Remarks on the set of reasonable outcomes in a general coalition function form game. International Journal of Game Theory. 16:1987;123-143.
10. Molina E., Tejada J. The equalizer and the lexicographical solutions for cooperative fuzzy games: Characterizations and properties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 125:2002;369-387.
11. Milnor, J.W., 1952. Reasonable outcomes for n -person games, Research Memorandum RM 916, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
12. Sakawa M., Nishizaki I. A lexicographical concept in an. n -person cooperative fuzzy game Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 61:1994;265-275.
13. Tijs S.H. Bounds for the core and the. τ -value Moeschlin O., Pallaschke D. Game Theory and Mathematical Economics. 1981;123-132 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. Tijs S.H. An axiomatization of the. τ -value Mathematical Social Sciences. 13:1987;177-181.
15. Tijs S.H., Lipperts F.A.S. The hypercube and the core cover of. n -person cooperative games Cahiers du Centre d'Études de Researche Opérationelle. 24:1982;27-37.
16. Tijs S.H., Otten G.J. Compromise values in cooperative game theory. Top. 1:1993;1-51.
17. Tsurumi M., Tanino T., Inuiguchi M. A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games. European Journal of Operational Research. 129:2001;596-618.
18. van den Brink, R., 1994. A note on the τ -value and τ -related solution concepts, FEW Research Memorandum 652, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
19. van den Brink, R., 2002. A comment on the χ -value, Mimeo., Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
20. van Heumen, H., 1984. The μ -value: A solution concept for cooperative games, Master Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen (in Dutch).