Endangered species and timber harvesting: The case of red-cockaded woodpeckers

Economic Inquiry

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 150-165

  Zhang, Daowei ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842285859     PISSN: 00952583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ei/cbh051     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Binkley, C. S. Timber Supply from Nonindustrial Forests. Bulletin No. 92. Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT, 1981.
2. Bourland T. R., and R. L. Stroup. "Rent Payment as Incentive." Journal of Forestry, 93(4), 1996, 18-21.
3. Chang, S. J. "Rotation Age, Management Intensity, and the Economic Factors of Timber Production: Do Changes in Stumpage Price, Interest Rate, Regeneration Cost and Forest Taxation Matter?" Forest Science, 29(2), 1983, 267-78.
4. Cleaves, D., R. Busby, B. Doherty, and J. Martel. "Cost of Protecting Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat: Interaction of Parcel and Cluster Size," in Proceeding of the 24th Annual Southern Forest Economics Workshop, edited by D. Newman. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, 1994.
5. Czech, B., and P. R. Krausman. "Public Opinion on Endangered Species Conservation and Policy." Society and Natural Resources, 12, 1999, 469-79.
6. Dennis, D. F. "An Economic Analysis of Harvesting Behavior: Integrating Forest and Ownership Characteristics." Forest Science, 35(4), 1989, 1088-104.
7. Dillman, D. A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley, 1978.
8. Eisner,T., J. Lubchenco, E. O. Wilson, D. S. Wilcove, and M. J. Bean. "Building a Scientifically Sound Policy for Protecting Endangered Species." Science, 268, 1995, 1231-32.
9. Epstein, R. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
10. Environmental Defense Fund. "Incentives for Endangered Species Conservation Opportunities in the Sandhills of North Carolina." A Report to the Bernice Barbour, Beneficia, Unerhill, and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundations, 1995.
11. Feder, G., T. Onchan, Y. Chalamwong, and C. Hongladarom. Land Policy and Farm Productivity in Thailand. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.
12. Flick, W., R. Tufts, and D. Zhang. "Sweet Home as Forest Policy." Journal of Forestry, 94(4), 1996, 4-8.
13. Fox News. "Endangered Fish Policy May Have Cost Firefighters' Lives." 1 August 2001. Online document available at www.foxnews.com/story/0,2922,31019,00.html.
14. Gane, M., ed. "Martin Faustmann and the Evolution of Discounted Cash Flow: Two Articles from the Original German of 1849," trans. W. Linnard. Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, Institute Paper 42, 1968.
15. Government Accounting Office. Endangered Species Act: Information on Species Protection on Nonfederal Lands. GAO/RCED-95-16, Washington, DC, 1995.
16. Hyde, W. F. Timber Supply, Land Allocation and Economic Efficiency. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
17. _. "Marginal Costs of Managing Endangered Species: The Case of the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker." Journal of Agricultural Economic Research, 41(2), 1989, 12-19.
18. Innes, R. "Takings, Compensation and Equal Treatment of Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Property." Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 1997, 403-32.
19. Kulhavy, D. L., R. G. Hooper, and R. Costa. Red-Cockaded Woodpecker: Recovery, Ecology, and Management. Nacogdoches, TX: Stephen F. Austin State University Press, 1995.
20. Lueck, D., and J. Michael. "Preemptive Habitat Destruction under the Endangered Species Act." Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 2003.
21. Mann C. C., and M. L. Plummer. Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species. New York: Knopf, 1995.
22. Meyers, S. P., W. Flick, and R. Meldahl. "The Economics of Private Forestry: The Opportunity Cost of the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Management," in Proceeding of the 26th Annual Southern Forest Economics Workshop, edited by J. Caulfield and S. Bullard. Mississippi State University, 1996.
23. Polasky, S., and H. Doremus. "When the Truth Hurts: Endangered Species Policy on Private Land with Imperfect Information." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35(1), 1998, 22-47.
24. Roise, J. P., J. Chung, R. Lancia, and M. Lennartz. "Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat and Timber Management Production Possibilities." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 14(1), 1990, 6-12.
25. Salant, P., and D. A. Dillman. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York: Wiley, 1994.
26. Smith, W. B., J. S. Vissage, D. R. Darr, and R. M. Sheffield. Forest Resources of the United States, 1997. General Technical Report NC-219, St. Paul, MN, U.S. Forest Service North Central Research Station, 2001.
27. Souder, J. A. "Chasing Armadillos down Yellow Lines: Economics in the Endangered Species Act." Natural Resources Journal, 33, 1995, 1096-139.
28. Stroup, R. L. The Endangered Species Act: Making Innocent Species the Enemy. Policy Series PS-3. Bozeman, MT: Political Economy Research Center. 1995.
29. _. "The Economics of Compensating Property Owners." Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 1996, 55-65.
30. Timber-Mart South. Quarterly Report of the Market Prices for Timber Products of the South. Athens, GA: Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, 1999.
31. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Procedures Manual for Private Lands. Released with a cover letter by John R. Eadie, Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA, 1992.
32. Warren-Boulton, F. "Vertical Control by Labor Unions." American Economic Review, 67(3), 1977, 309-22.
33. Yandle, B. The Political Limits of Environmental Regulation: Tacking the Unicorn. New York: Quorum Books, 1989.
34. Zhang, D. "Endangered Species Conservation on Private Lands: Some New Initiatives." Forest Landowner, 58(3), 1999, 12-15.
35. _. "Faustmann in an Uncertain Policy Environment." Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 2001, 203-10.
36. Zhang, D., and W. Flick. "Sticks, Carrots, and Reforestation Investment." Land Economics, 77(3), 2001, 443-56.
37. Zhang, D., and P. H. Pearse. "Differences in Silviculturel Investment under Various Types of Forest Tenure in British Columbia." Forest Science, 44 (4), 1996, 442-49.
38. _. "The Influence of the Form of Tenure on Reforestation in British Columbia." Forest Ecology and Management, 98, 1997, 239-50.