Evidence Base for Peacemaker Mode Selection from Physiology to Randomized Trials

Circulation

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 443-451

  Lamas, Gervasio A ^a   Ellenbogen, Kenneth A ^b   Hennekens, Charles H ^a   Montanez, Alicia ^a  

^a Miami Heart Inst   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Pacemakers; Physiology; Trials

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION; BRADYCARDIA; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SINUS RHYTHM; STROKE; SURVIVAL RATE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART ATRIUM FUNCTION; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYNDROME;

ARRHYTHMIA; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; ATRIAL FUNCTION; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HEART RATE; HUMANS; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SYNDROME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION;

EID: 0842285834     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115642.05037.0E     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Elmqvist R, Senning Å. Implantable peacemaker for the heart. In: Smyth CN, ed. Medical Electronics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Medical Electronics, Paris, 24-27 June 1959. London, UK. Iliffe and Sons; 1960:253-254.
2. Furman S, Robinson G. Use of an intracardiac pacemaker in the correction of total heart block. Surg Forum. 1958;9:245-248.
3. Benditt DG, Milstein S, Buetikofer J, et al. Sensor-triggered rate-variable cardiac pacing. Ann Int Med. 1987;107:714-724.
4. Leung SK, Lau CP, Camm J. An overview of sensors: ideal characteristics sensor combination and automaticity. In: Ellenbogen KA, Kay GN, Wilkoff BL, eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000:219-248.
5. Lamas GA, Estes NM III, Schneller S, et al. Does dual chamber or atrial pacing prevent atrial fibrillation? The need for a randomized controlled trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:1109-1113.
6. Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Strategies for mode selection in antibradyarrhythmia pacing. Cardiol Clin. 1992;10:719-734.
7. Ovsyshcher IE, Hayes DL, Furman S. Dual-chamber pacing is superior to ventricular pacing fact or controversy? Circulation. 1998;97:2368-2370.
8. Edhag O, Swahn A. Prognosis of patients with complete heart-block or arrhythmic syncope who were not treated with artificial pacemakers. Acta Med Scand. 1976;200:457-463.
9. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, and Company; 1987.
10. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Observational evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;703:18-24.
11. Montanez A, Hennekens CH, Zebede J, et al. Pacemaker mode selection: the evidence from randomized trials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:1270-1282.
12. Lamas GA. Physiological consequences of normal atrioventricular conduction: applicability to modern cardiac pacing. J Card Surg. 1989;4:89-98.
13. Samet P, Castillo C, Bernstein WH. Hemodynamic sequelae of atrial ventricular and sequential atrioventricular pacing in cardiac patients. Am Heart J. 1966;72:725-729.
14. Rahimtoola SH, Ehsani A, Sinno MZ, et al. Left atrial transport function in myocardial infarction: Importance of its booster pump function. Am J Med. 1975;59:686-694.
15. Boucher CA, Pohost GM, Okada RD, et al. Effect of ventricular pacing on left ventricular function assessed by radionuclide angiography. Am Heart J. 1983;106:1105-1111.
16. Hoeschen RJ, Reimold SC, Lee RT, et al. The effect of posture on the response to atrioventricular synchronous pacing in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14: 756-759.
17. Greenberg B, Chatterjee K, Parmley WW, et al. The influence of left ventricular filling pressure on atrial contribution to cardiac output. Am Heart J. 1979;98:742-751.
18. Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, et al. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1542-1549.
19. Lamas GA, Pashos CL, Normand SLT, et al. Permanent pacemaker selection and subsequent survival in elderly Medicare pacemaker recipients. Circulation. 1995;91:1063-1069.
20. Connolly SJ, Kerr C, Gent M, et al. Dual-chamber versus ventricular pacing critical appraisal of current data. Circulation. 1996;94:578-583.
21. Lamas GA. Pacemaker mode selection and survival: a plea to apply the principles of evidence based medicine to cardiac pacing practice. Heart. 1997;78:218-220.
22. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, et al. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994; 344:1523-1528.
23. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997;350:1210-1216.
24. Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, et al. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1998;97:987-995.
25. Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1097-1104.
26. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1385-1391.
27. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346: 1854-1862.
28. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC. Pacing in sick sinus syndrome-need for a prospective randomized trial comparing atrial with dual chamber pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1175-1179.
29. Toquero J, Geelen P, Goethals M, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12:1425-1428.
30. Wiggers CJ. The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1925;73:346-378.
31. Grover M, Glantz SA. Endocardial pacing site affects left ventricular end diastolic volume and performance in intact anesthetized dog. Circ Res. 1983;53:72-85.
32. Burkhoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:H428-H435.
33. Zile MR, Blaustein AS, Shimizu G, et al. Right ventricular pacing reduces the rate of left ventricular relaxation and filling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:702-709.
34. Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H, et al. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation. 1989;79:845-853.
35. Bramlet DA, Morris KG, Coleman RE, et al. Effects of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function. Circulation. 1983;67:1059-1065.
36. Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:148-156.
37. Mark JB, Chetham PM. Ventricular pacing can induce hemodynamically significant mitral valve regurgitation. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:375-377.
38. Prinzen F, Peschar M. Relation between the pacing induced sequence of activation and left ventricular pump function in animals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:484-498.
39. Lee MA, Dae MW, Langberg JJ, et al. Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:225-232.
40. Tse H-F, Lau C-P. Long term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:744-749.
41. Nielsen JC, Bottcher M, Nielsen TT, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing-effect of pacing mode and rate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1453-1461.
42. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003;107:2932-2937.
43. Saksena S, Mehra R, Ellenbogen KA. Pacing for prevention of tachyarrhythmias. In: Ellenbogen KA, Kay GN, Wilkoff BL, eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000:479-507.
44. Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP. Effect of the atrioventricular interval during pacing or reciprocating tachycardia on atrial size, pressure, and refractory period. Circulation. 1990;82:60-68.
45. Calkins J, El-Atassi R, Leon A. Effect of the atrioventricular relationship on atrial refractoriness in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:771-778.
46. Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Orav EJ, et al. Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:2000-2007.
47. Wharton JM, Sorrentino RA, Campbell P, et al. Effect of pacing modality on atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome: preliminary results of the Pacemaker Atrial Tachycardia Trial. Circulation 1998;98(suppl 1):I-494. Abstract.
48. Daubert C, Mabo Ph, Berder V, et al. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with high degree interatrial conduction block: prevention by permanent atrial resynchronization. Eur J Card Pacing Electrophysiol. 1994;1: 35-44.
49. Saksena S, Prakash A, Hill M, et al. Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:687-94.
50. Saksena S, Prakash A, Ziegler P, et al. Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1140-1150.
51. Ausubel K, Furman S. The pacemaker syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 103:420-429.
52. Mitsui T, Hori M, Suma K, et al. The pacemaking syndrome. In: Jacobs JE, ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. Chicago, III: Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 1969:29-33.
53. Ellenbogen KA, Thames MD, Mohanty PK. New insights into pacemaker syndrome gained from hemodynamic humoral and vascular responses during ventriculo-atrial pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:53-59.
54. Pehrsson SK, Hjemdahl O, Nordlander R, et al. A comparison of sympatho-adrenal activity and cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in patients with ventricular demand or atrial synchronous pacing. Br Heart J. 1988;60:212-220.
55. Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Stambler B. Clinical, hemodynamic, and neurohumoral features of pacemaker syndrome. In: Barold SS, Mugia J, eds. New Perspectives in Cardiac Pacing. Mt Kisco, NY: Futura; 1992.
56. Heldman D, Mulvihill D, Nguyen H, et al. True incidence of pacemaker syndrome: an iatrogenic condition. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13: 1742-1750.
57. Ellenbogen KA, Stambler BS, Orav EJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVIR pacing. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:59-63.
58. Bjerregaard P. Mean 24 hour heart rate, minimal heart rate, and pauses in healthy subjects 40-79 years of age. Eur Heart J. 1983;4:44-51.
59. Capucci A, Boriani G, Specchia S. Evaluation of DDDR versus DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:1908-1913.
60. Jutzy RV, Florio J, Isaeff DM, et al. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:1838-1846.
61. Lazarus A, Mitchell K, et al. A prospective multicenter study demonstrating clinical benefit with a new accelerometer-based DDDR pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19(part II):1694-1697.
62. Gwinn N, Lemen R, Kratz J, et al. Chronotopic incompetence: a common and progressive finding in pacemaker patients. Am Heart J. 1992;123: 1216-1219.
63. Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, et al. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:696-706.
64. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. Equity Research, North America. Healthcare: Pharmaceuticals, Hospital Supplies & Medical. New York, NY: Morgan Stanley Dean Witter; July 26, 2000.
65. Lamas GA, Williams A. Have the results of randomized clinical trials of pacing altered the practice of cardiac pacing? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14(suppl):1-15.