Optimal designs for Michaelis-Menten kinetic studies

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 477-491

  Matthews, J N S ^a   Allock, G C ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian design; Efficiency; Michaelis Menten kinetics; Optimal design

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; MICHAELIS MENTEN KINETICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VARIANCE;

BAYES THEOREM; ENZYMES; HUMANS; KINETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0842281897     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1612     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Forsyth RJ, Bartlett K, Burchell A, Scott HM, Eyre JA. Astrocytic glucose-6-phosphatase and the permeability of brain microsomes to glucose 6-phosphatase. Biochemical Journal 1993; 294:145-151.
2. Mutch E, Blain PG, Williams FM. The role of metabolism in determining susceptibility to parathion toxicity in man. Toxicology Letters 1999; 107:177-187.
3. Cornish-Bowden A. Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics. Portland Press: London, 1995.
4. Cleland WW. The statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. Advances in Enzymology 1967; 29:1-32.
5. Duggleby RG. Experimental designs for estimating the kinetic parameters for enzyme-catalysed reactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1979; 81:671-684.
6. Endrenyi L, Chan F-Y. Optimal design of experiments for the estimation of precise hyperbolic kinetic and binding parameters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1981; 90:241-263.
7. Currie DJ. Estimating Michaelis-Menten parameters: bias variance and experimental design. Biometrics 1982; 38:907-919.
8. López-Fidalgo J, Wong WK. Design issues for the Michaelis-Menten model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2002; 215:1-11.
9. Atkinson AC, Donev AN. Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1992.
10. Kitsos CP. On the support points of D-optimal nonlinear experimental designs for chemical kinetics. In Advances in Model-Oriented Data Analysis, Kitsos CP, Mueller WG (eds). Physica-Verlag: Berlin, 1995; 71-76.
11. Chaloner K, Verdinelli I. Bayesian experimental design: a review. Statistical Science 1995; 10:273-304.
12. Dette H, Biedermann S. Robust and efficient designs for the Michaelis-Menten model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2003; (in press).
13. Numerical Algorithms Group. The NAG FORTRAN Library Mark 17. The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd.: Oxford, 1996.
14. Ruppert D, Cressie N, Carroll RJ. A transformation/weighting model for estimating Michaelis-Menten parameters. Biometrics 1989; 45:637-656.
15. Nelder JA. Generalized linear models for enzyme-kinetic data. Biometrics 1991; 47:1605-1615.
16. Cressie NAC, Keightley DD. The underlying structure of the direct linear plot with application to the analysis of hormone-receptor interactions. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 1979; 11:1173-1180.
17. StatCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. Stata Corporation: College Station TX, 2000.
18. Matthews JNS. Alternative criteria for optimal designs of limiting dilution assays. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:2733-2746.
19. Song D, Wong WK. Optimal two-point designs for the Michaelis-Menten model with heteroscedastic errors. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 1998; 27:1503-1516.