Biological computation of image motion from flows over boundaries

Journal of Physiology Paris

Volumn 97, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 325-334

  Johnston, A ^a   McOwan, P W ^b   Benton, C P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cortex; Differential forms; Motion; Optic flow; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; BRIGHTNESS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTION; RETINA IMAGE; SIMULATION; VELOCITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0842281590     PISSN: 09284257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Reichardt W. Rosenblith W.A. Sensory Communication. 1961;303-317 Wiley, New York.
2. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2:1985;284-299.
3. Fennema C.L., Thompson W.B. Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 9:1979;301-315.
4. Horn B.K.P., Schunck B.G. Determining optical flow. Artif. Intel. 17:1981;185-203.
5. Johnston A., McOwan P.W., Buxton H.A. Computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 250:1992;297-306.
6. Heeger D.J., Simoncelli E.P. Harris L. Spatial Vision in Humans and Robots. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Heeger D.J. Model for the extraction of image flow. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 4:1987;1455-1471.
8. Simoncelli E.P., Heeger D.J. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vis. Res. 38:1998;743-762.
9. Johnston A., Wright M.J. Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision. Vis. Res. 26:1986;1099-1109.
10. Thompson P. Perceived rate of movement depends upon contrast. Vis. Res. 22:1982;377-380.
11. Johnston A., Benton C.P., Morgan M.J. Concurrent measurement of perceived speed and speed discrimination threshold using the method of single stimuli. Vis. Res. 39:1999;3849-3854.
12. Johnston A., McOwan P.W., Benton C.P. Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:1999;509-518.
13. Johnston A., Benton C.P., McOwan P.W. Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:1999;2441-2450.
14. Benton C.P., Johnston A. A new approach to analysing texture-defined motion. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:2002;2441-2450.
15. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Landy M., Movshon J.A. Computational Models of Visual Processing. 1991;1-20 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Weintraub S. Differential Forms: A Complement to Vector Calculus. 1997;Academic Press, San Diego.
17. Mitiche A., Bouthemy P. Computation and analysis of image motion: a synopsis of current problems and methods. In. J. Comput. Vis. 19:1996;29-55.
18. Koenderink J.J. Solid Shape. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Gupta N., Kanal L. Gradient based image motion estimation without computing gradients. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 22:1997;81-101.
20. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biol. Cybernet. 55:1987;367-375.
21. Koenderink J.J. Operational significance of receptive field assemblies. Biol. Cybernet. 58:1988;163-171.
22. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Receptive field assembly pattern specificity. J. Vis. Commun. Image Rep. 3:1992;1-12.
23. R.A.Young, R.M. Lesperance, A physiological model of motion analysis for machine vision, Technical Report, General Motors Research Laboratories GMR-7878, 1993, pp. 1-76.
24. Bruce V., Green P.R., Georgeson M.A. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology & Ecology. third ed. 1996;Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hove.
25. Johnston A., Clifford C.W.G. A unified account of three apparent motion illusions. Vis. Res. 35:1995;1109-1123.
26. Werkhoven P., Koenderink J. Extraction of motion parallax structure in the visual system 1. Biol. Cybernet. 63:1990;185-191.
27. Otte M., Nagel H. Estimation of optical flow based on higher-order spatio-temporal derivatives in interlaced and non-interlaced image sequences. Artif. Intel. 78:1995;5-43.
28. Lang S. Calculus of Several Variables. 1987;Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 158:1974;267-294.
30. Albright T.D., Desimone R., Gross C.G. Columnar organisation of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 51:1984;16-31.
31. Verri A., Straforini M., Torre V. Computational aspects of motion perception in natural and artificial vision systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 337:1992;429-443.
32. Srinivasan M.V. Generalised gradient scheme for the measurement of two-dimensional image motion. Biol. Cybernet. 63:1990;421-431.
33. Adelson E.H., Movshon J.T. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature. 300:1982;523-525.
34. Orban G.A., Kennedy H., Maes H. Response to movement of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat. J. Neurophsiol. 45:1981;1043-1058.
35. Mikami A., Newsome W.T., Wurtz R.H. Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex I. Mechanisms of direction and speed selectivity in extrastriate area MT. J. Neurophysiol. 55:1986;1308-1327.
36. Rodman H.R., Albright T.D. Coding of stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque. Vis. Res. 27:1987;2035-2048.
37. Lagae L., Raiguel S., Orban G.A. Speed and direction selectivity of macaque middle temporal neurones. J. Neurophysiol. 69:1993;19-39.
38. Cheng K., Hasegawa T., Saleem K.S., Tanaka K. Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 71:1994;2269-2280.
39. Kelly D.H. Visual responses to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51:1961;422.
40. Movshon J.A., Adelson E.H., Gizzi E.H., Newsome W.T. Chagass C., Gattas R., Gross C. Pattern Recognition Mechanisms. 1985;Springer, New York.
41. Baker C., Hess R., Zihl J. Residual motion perception in a motion blind patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;454-461.
42. McLeod P., Dittrich W., Driver J., Perrett D., Zihl J. Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a motion-blind patient. Vis. Cogn. 3:1996;363-391.
43. Newsome W.T., Pare E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J. Neurosci. 8:1988;2201-2211.
44. Marcar V.L., Xiao D.K., Raiguel S.E., Maes H., Orban G.A. Processing of kinetically defined boundaries in the cortical motion area MT of macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 74:1995;1258-1271.