Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain with an Altered Redox Metabolism

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 269-276

  Bro, Christoffer ^a   Regenberg, Birgitte ^a   Nielsen, Jens ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; DNA arrays; Ethanol production; Metabolic engineering; Transcription analysis

Indexed keywords

ENZYME KINETICS; FUNGI; GENES; METABOLISM;

GENE ENCODING; GENE SUBSET;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

GLUTAMATE DEHYDROGENASE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHOGLUCONATE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; DNA MICROARRAY; DOWN REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STUDENT T TEST;

GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; GLUTAMATE DEHYDROGENASE (NADP+); MUTATION; NADP; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0842278678     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10899     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson SF, Steber CM, Esposito RE, Coleman JE. 1995. UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1 DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci 4:1832-1843.
2. Bender R, Lange S. 2001. Adjusting for multiple testing-When and how? J Clin Epidemiol 54:343-349.
3. Bruinenberg PM, van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. 1983. A theoretical analysis of NADPH production and consumption in yeasts. J Gen Microbiol 129:953-964.
4. Cliften PF, Hillier LW, Fulton L, Graves T, Miner T, Gish WR, Waterston RH, Johnston M. 2001. Surveying Saccharomyces genomes to identify functional elements by comparative DNA sequence analysis. Genome Res 11:1175-1186.
5. DeLuna A, Avendano A, Riego L, Gonzalez A. 2001. NADP-glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Purification, kinetic properties, and physiological roles. J Biol Chem 276:43775-43783.
6. Entian KD, Schuster T, Hegemann JH, Becher D, Feldmann H, Guldener U, Gotz R, Hansen M, Hollenberg CP, Jansen G, Kramer W, Klein S, Kotter P, Kricke J, Launhardt H, Mannhaupt G, Maierl A, Meyer P, Mewes W, Munder T, Niedenthal RK, Ramezani RM, Rohmer A, Romer A, Hinnen A. 1999. Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach. Mol Gen Genet 262:683-702.
7. Förster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J. 2003. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 13:244-253.
8. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Wahlbom CF, Gardonyi M, van Zyl WH, Cordero Otero RR, Jonsson LJ. 2001. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 73:53-84.
9. Jensen LJ, Gupta R, Staerfeldt HH, Brunak S. 2003. Prediction of human protein function according to gene ontology categories. Bioinformatics 19:635-642.
10. Knudsen S. 2002. A biologist guide to analysis of DNA microarray data. New York: Wiley.
11. Martinez-Pastor MT, Marchler G, Schuller C, Marchler-Bauer A, Ruis H, Estruch F. 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J 15:2227-2235.
12. +-specific isocitrate dehydrogenases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273:31486-31493.
13. Møller K, Bro C, Piskur J, Nielsen J, Olsson L. 2002. Steady state and transient-state analysis of aerobic fermentation in Saccharomyces kluyveri. FEMS Yeast Res 2:233-244.
14. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 2000. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng 2:69-77.
15. Nissen TL, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 1997. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol 143:203-218.
16. Overkamp KM, Bakker BM, Kotter P, Luttik MA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. 2002. Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2814-2821.
17. Park HD, Luche RM, Cooper TG. 1992. The yeast UME6 gene product is required for transcriptional repression mediated by the CAR1 URS1 repressor binding site. Nucleic Acids Res 20:1909-1915.
18. Piper MD, Daran-Lapujade P, Bro C, Regenberg B, Knudsen S, Nielsen J, Pronk JT. 2002. Reproducibility of oligonucleotide microarray transcriptome analyses. An interlaboratory comparison using chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277:37001-37008.
19. Strich R, Surosky RT, Steber C, Dubois E, Messenguy F, Esposito RE. 1994. UME6 is a key regulator of nitrogen repression and meiotic development. Genes Dev 8:796-810.
20. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, Francois JM, Gancedo C, Giuseppin ML, Heijnen JJ, Hoare M, Lange HC, Madden EA, Niederberger P, Nielsen J, Parrou JL, Petit T, Porro D, Reuss M, van Riel N, Rizzi M, Steensma HY, Verrips CT, Vindelov J, Pronk JT. 2000. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:706-714.
21. van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. 1986. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:199-224.
22. van Helden J, Andre B, Collado-Vides J. 2000. A web site for the computational analysis of yeast regulatory sequences. Yeast 16:177-187.
23. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. 1990. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol 136:395-403.
24. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. 1992. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501-517.
25. Wahlbom F, Otero C, Cordero Otero RR, van Zyl WH, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Jönsson LJ. 2003. Molecular analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with improved ability to utilise xylose shows enhanced expression of proteins involved in transport, initial xylose metabolism and the pentose phosphate pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:740-746.
26. Wang Z-X, Zhuge J, Fang H, Prior BA. 2001. Glycerol production by microbial fermentation: A review. Biotechnol Adv 19:201-223.
27. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, Chu AM, Connelly C, Davis K, Dietrich F, Dow SW, El Bakkoury M, Foury F, Friend SH, Gentalen E, Giaever G, Hegemann JH, Jones T, Laub M, Liao H, Davis RW. 1999. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906.
28. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R, Hall D, Casamayor A, Bertone P, Lan N, Jansen R, Bidlingmaier S, Houfek T, Mitchell T, Miller P, Dean RA, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2001. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293:2101-2105.