Who's afraid of visual culture?

Antipode

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 232-237

  Ryan, James R ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL INFLUENCE; GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0842273659     PISSN: 00664812     EISSN: 14678330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00320     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alfrey N and Daniels S (eds) (1990) Mapping the Landscape: Essays on Art and Cartography. Nottingham: University Art Gallery & Castle Museum
2. Cosgrove D (ed) (1988) Mappings. London: Reaktion Books
3. Deutsche R (1995) Surprising geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85:168-175
4. Driver F (1995) Visualizing geography: A journey to the heart of the discipline. Progress in Human Geography 19:123-134
5. Driver F (2000) Fieldwork in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25:267-268
6. Driver F, Nash C, Prendergast K and Swenson I (eds) (2002) Landing: Eight Collaborative Projects between Artists and Geographers. Egham, Surrey: Royal Holloway, University of London, http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/vg/ (last accessed 24 December 2002)
7. Franklin S (1999) The Time of Trees. Milan: Leonardo Arte
8. Gilbert D (1995) Between two cultures: Geography, computing and the humanities. Ecumene 2:1-13
9. Gregory D (1993) Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell
10. Gregory D (1995) Imaginative geographies. Progress in Human Geography 19:447-485
11. Harley J B (1992) Deconstructing the map. In T J Barnes and J S Duncan (eds) Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape (pp 231-247). London: Routledge
12. Jackson P (1991) The crisis of representation and the politics of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9:131-134
13. Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
14. Livingstone D N (1998) Reproduction, representation and authenticity: A rereading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 23:13-20
15. Makrolab (2002) http://makrolab.ljudmila.org (last accessed 24 December 2002)
16. Matless D (1998) Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion Books
17. Nash C (1996) Reclaiming vision: Looking at landscape and the body. Gender, Place and Culture 3:149-169
18. Nash C (1998) Mapping emotion. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16:1-9
19. Nelson R (2000) The slide lecture: Or, the work of art history in the age of mechanical reproduction. Critical Inquiry 6:414-434
20. Ploszajska T (1999) Geographical Education, Empire and Citizenship: Geographical Teaching and Learning in English Schools, 1870-1944. Historical Geography Research Series no 35. London: RGS/IBG
21. Rose G (1992) Geography as a science of observation: The landscape, the gaze and masculinity. In F Driver and G Rose (eds) Nature and Science: Essays in the History of Geographical Knowledge (pp 8-18). Historical Geography Research Series no 28. London: RGS/IBG
22. Rose G (2001) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Interpreting Visual Objects. London: Sage
23. Ryan J (1994) Visualising imperial geography: Halford Mackinder and the Colonial Office Visual Instruction Committee, 1902-1911. Ecumene: A Journal of Environment, Culture, Meaning 1:157-176
24. Schwartz J M (1996) The geography lesson: Photographs and the construction of imaginative geographies. Journal of Historical Geography 22:16-45
25. Sinclair I (2002) London Orbital. London: Granta
26. Sui D Z (2000) Visuality, aurality and shifting metaphors of geographical thought in the late twentieth century. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90: 322-343
27. Thrift N (2000) Introduction: Dead or alive? In I Cook, D Crouch, S Naylor and J R Ryan (eds) Cultural Tunis/Geographical Tunis: Perspectives on Cultural Geography (pp 1-6). Harlow: Pearson Education