A parameter based admission control for differentiated services networks

Computer Networks

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 463-479

  Fidler, Markus ^a   Sander, Volker ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Admission control; Bandwidth Broker; Differentiated Services; Network Calculus; Quality of Service; Turn Prohibition

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; CODES (STANDARDS); COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; ROUTERS; SCHEDULING; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

ADMISSION CONTROL; BANDWIDTH BROKERS; DIFFERENTIATED SERVICES NETWORKS; NETWORK CALCULUS; TURN PROHIBITION;

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

EID: 0842265104     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2003.12.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. H.-M. Adler, 10 Gigabit/s Plattform für das G-WiN Betriebsbereit, DFN Mitteilungen, Heft 60, November 2002.
2. D. Awduche et al., Requirements for traffic engineering over MPLS, RFC 2702, 1999.
3. S. Blake et al., An architecture for differentiated services, RFC 2475, 1998.
4. Chang C.-S. Performance Guarantees in Communication Networks. 2000;Springer, Berlin.
5. Charny A., Le Boudec J.-Y. Delay bounds in a network with aggregate scheduling. Proceedings of QofIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 1922:2000;Springer, Berlin.
6. A. Charny et al., Supplemental information for the new definition of EF PHB (Expedited Forwarding Per-Hop-Behavior), RFC 3247, 2002.
7. P.F. Chimento et al., QBONE signaling design team: final report, 2001. Available from 〈 http://qos.internet2.edu/wg/documents-informational/ 20020709-chimento-etal-qbone-signaling/〉.
8. Cruz R.L. A calculus for network delay, part I: network elements in isolation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 37(1):1991;114-131.
9. Cruz R.L. A calculus for network delay, part II: network analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 37(1):1991;132-141.
10. R.L. Cruz, SCED+: efficient management of quality of service guarantees, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 1998.
11. B. Davie et al., An expedited forwarding PHB, RFC 3246, 2002.
12. G. Einhoff, Quality of service routing for an IP premium service based on MPLS traffic engineering, Master's Thesis, Aachen Universtiy, 2003.
13. M. Fidler, Providing Internet quality of service based on differentiated services traffic engineering, Ph.D. Thesis, Aachen University, 2003.
14. Fidler M. On the impacts of traffic shaping on end-to-end delay bounds in aggregate scheduling networks. Proceedings of QofIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 2811:2003;Springer, Berlin.
15. I. Foster, M. Fidler, A. Roy, V. Sander, L. Winkler, End-to-end quality of service for high-end applications, Computer Communications, in press.
16. Haverkort B. Performance of Computer Communication Systems. 1998;Wiley, New York.
17. J. Heinanen et al., Assured forwarding PHB group, RFC 2597, 1999.
18. Kar K., Kodialam M., Lakshman T.V. Minimum interference routing of bandwidth guaranteed tunnels with MPLS traffic engineering applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications. 18(12):2000;2566-2579.
19. Law A.M., Kelton W.D. Simulation, Modeling, and Analysis. third ed. 2000;McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. J.-Y. Le Boudec, P. Thiran, Network calculus made easy, technical report EPFL-DI 96/218. Ecole Polytechnique Federale, Lausanne (EPFL), 1996.
21. Le Boudec J.-Y., Thiran P. Network Calculus A Theory of Deterministic Queueing Systems for the Internet. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 2050:2002;Springer, Berlin. Version July 6.
22. Lenzini L., Mingozzi E., Stea G. Delay bounds for FIFO aggregates: a case study. Proceedings of QofIS. LNCS 2811. 2003;Springer.
23. Schroeder M.D., Birrell A.D., Burrows M., Murray H., Needham R.M., Rodeheffer T.L., Satterthwaite E.H., Thacker C.P. Autonet: a high-speed, self-configuring local area network using point-to-point links. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 9(8):1991;1318-1335.
24. K. Nichols, B. Carpenter, Definition of differentiated services per domain behaviors and rules for their specification, RFC 3086, 2001.
25. K. Nichols, V. Jacobson, L. Zhang, A two-bit differentiated services architecture for the internet, RFC 2638, 1999.
26. Pareck A.K., Gallager R.G. A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the single-node case. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 1(3):1993;344-357.
27. Pareck A.K., Gallager R.G. A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the multiple-node case. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 2(2):1994;137-150.
28. E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon, Multiprotocol label switching architecture, RFC 3031, 2001.
29. Roy R., Sander V. GARA: a uniform quality of service architecture. Nabrzyski J., Schopf J., Weglarz J. Grid Resource Management - State of the Art and Future Trends. 2003;377-394 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
30. V. Sander, Design and evaluation of a bandwidth broker that provides network quality of service for grid applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Aachen University, 2002.
31. Sander V., Fidler M. Evaluation of a differentiated services based implementation of a premium and an olympic service. Proceedings of QofIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 2511:2002;Springer, Berlin.
32. D. Starobinski, M. Karpovsky, L. Zakrevski, Application of network calculus to general topologies using turn-prohibition, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2002.
33. N. Taft-Plotkin, B. Bellur, R. Ogier, Quality of service routing using maximally disjoint paths, in: Proceedings of IWQoS, 1999.
34. P. Trimintzios et al., An architectural framework for providing QoS in IP differentiated services networks, in: Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, 2001.
35. S. Wang, D. Xuan, R. Bettati, W. Zhao, Providing absolute differentiated services for real-time applications in static-priority scheduling networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2001.