Production, Identity Preservation, and Labeling in a Marketplace with Genetically Modified and Non-Genetically Modified Foods

Plant Physiology

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-10

  Huffman, Wallace E ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842264054     PISSN: 00320889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.033423     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Buttel F (2003) Internalizing the societal Costs of agricultural production. Plant Physiol 133: 1656-1665
2. Caswell JA (2000) Labeling policy for GMOs: to each his own? AgBioForum 3: 53-57. http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu
3. Council for Biotechnology Information (2001) Frequently asked questions. http://www.whybiotech.com/en/faq/default.asp?MID=10
4. Duffy M (2002) Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa - 2003. Iowa State University Extension, FM 1712, January 2003
5. Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300: 758-762
6. Falck-Zepeda JB, Traxler G, Nelson RG (2000) Surplus distribution from the introduction of biotechnology innovation. Am J Agric Econ 82: 360-369
7. Friends of the Earth (2001) The need for labeling genetically engineered foods. http://www.foe.org/safefood/factshtgelabel.htm
8. Greenpeace International (2003) Genetic engineering retrieved. http:// www.greenpeace.org/international_en/campaigns/intro?campaign%5 fid=3942
9. Greenpeace International (2001) We want natural food! http://www. greenpeace.org/~geneng/
10. Griliches Z (1960) Hybrid corn and the economics of innovation. Science 132: 275-280
11. Harl NF (2001) Opportunities and Problems in Agricultural Biotechnology, Paper presented at the Third International Value-Enhanced Grain Conference and Trade Workshop, Portland, OR, July 23
12. Hucl P, Matus-Cadiz M (2001) Isolation distances for minimizing outcrossing in spring wheat. Crop Sci 41: 1348-1351
13. Huffman WE, Evenson RE (1993) Science for Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective. Iowa State University Press, Ames
14. Huffman WE, Shogren JF, Rousu M, Tegene A (2003) Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified foods labels in a market with diverse information: evidence from experimental auctions. J Agric Resour Econ (in press)
15. Huffman WE, Tegene A (2002) Public acceptance of and benefits from agricultural biotechnology: a key role for verifiable information. In V Santaniello, RE Evenson, D Zilberman, Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods. CAB International, New York, pp 179-190
16. Lamkey K (2002) GMO's Gene Flow: A Plant Breeding Perspective. Presented at Biotechnology, Gene Flow, and Intellectual Property Rights: An Agricultural Summit, Purdue University
17. Luna VS, Figueroa JM, Baltazar BM, Gomes RL, Townsend R, Schoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effect pollen control. Crop Sci 41: 1551-1557
18. Mohol I (1997) The Economics of Information: Lying and Cheating in Markets and Organization. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA
19. Nestle M (2003) Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. The University of California Press, Berkeley
20. Paarlberg RL (2001) The Politics of Precaution: Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
21. Qaim M, Zilberman D (2003) Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299: 900-902
22. Rousu M, Huffman WE, Shogren JF, Tegene A (2003a) Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food. Iowa State University, Ames
23. Rousu M, Huffman WE, Shogren JF, Tegene A (2003b) Are United States Consumers' Tolerant of Genetically Modified Foods? Review of Agricultural Economics (in press)
24. Sandler T (1992) Collective Action: Theory and Applications. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
25. Tegene A, Huffman WE, Rousu M, Shogren JF (2003) Affects of Information on Consumer Demand for Biotechnical Foods: Evidence from Experimental Auctions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1903
26. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2003) Agricultural Biotechnology: Adoption of Biotechnology and its Production Impacts. Economic Research Service/U.S. Department of Agriculture Briefing Room. http://www.ers. usda.gov/briefing/biotechnolgy/chapter1.htm
27. van den Belt H (2003) Plant Physiology. In WW Wilson, BL Dahl, Costs and Risks of Testing and Segregating GM Wheat. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 501. University of North Dakota, Brookings (in press)
28. Wilson WW, Dahl BL (2002) Costs and Risks of Testing and Segregating GM Wheat. Agricultural Experiment Station, Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 501. North Dakota State University, Fargo