SFAS No. 123 stock-based compensation expense and equity market values

Accounting Review

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 251-275

  Aboody, David ^a   Earth, Mary E ^b   Kasznik, Ron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742329270     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aboody, D. 1996. Market valuation of employee stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 357-391.
2. _, M. E. Earth, and R. Kasznik. 2003. Do firms understate stock-based compensation expense disclosed under SPAS No. 123? Working paper, Stanford University.
3. Accounting Principles Board (APB). 1973. Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. APB Opinion No. 25. New York, NY: APB.
4. Barth, M. E., M. B. Clement, G. Foster, and R. Kasznik. 1998. Brand values and capital market valuation. Review of Accounting Studies 3: 41-68.
5. _, W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 77-104.
6. Bell, T. B., W. R. Landsman, B. L. Miller, and S. Yeh. 2002. The valuation implications of employee stock option accounting for profitable computer software firms. The Accounting Review 77: 971-996.
7. Berk, R. A. 1990. A primer on robust regression. In Modern Methods of Data Analysis, edited by J. Fox, and J. S. Long, 292-324. Newbury Park, CA: Saga Publications.
8. Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy 81: 637-654.
9. BusinessWeek. 2002. Earnings: A cleaner look. (May 27): 34-37.
10. Chamberlain, S. L., and S. J. Hsieh. 1999. The effectiveness of SFAS No. 123 employee stock option cost disclosures. Working paper, Santa Clara University.
11. Core J., and W. Guay. 2001. Stock options plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics 61: 253-287.
12. DeFusco, R. A., R. R. Johnson, and T. S. Zorn. 1990. The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders. Journal of Finance 45: 617-627.
13. _. 1995. Accounting for Stock-based Compensation. FASB Statement No. 123. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
14. Griliches, Z., and M. Intriligator. 1983. Handbook of Econometrics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
15. Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 3-43.
16. Hausman, J., and W. Taylor. 1981. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica: 1377-1398.
17. Holthausen, R. W., and R. L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 3-75.
18. Huddart, S., and M. Lang. 1996. Employee stock option exercises: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 5-43.
19. Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98: 225-264.
20. Kasznik, R., and B. Lev. 1995. To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. The Accounting Review 70: 113-134.
21. Lambert, R. A., and D. F. Larcker. 1987. Executive compensation effects of large corporate acquisitions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 6: 231-243.
22. Lambert, R. A., D. F. Larcker, and K. Weigelt. 1993. The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 383: 438-461.
23. Landsman, W. R., and J. Magliolo. 1988. Cross-sectional capital market research and model specification. The Accounting Review 63 (October): 586-604.
24. Lazear, E. P. 2001. Output-based pay: Incentives, retention or sorting? Working paper, Stanford University.
25. Li, H. 2002. Employee stock options, residual income valuation and stock price reaction to SFAS No. 123 footnote disclosures. Working paper, The University of Iowa.
26. Liu, J., and J. A. Ohlson. 2000. The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical implications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15: 321-331.
27. Murphy, K. J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 11-42.
28. Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 661-687.
29. _. 2001. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research 18: 107-120.
30. Oyer, P. 2001. Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects? Working paper, Stanford University.
31. _, and S. Scheafer. 2002. Why do some firms give stock options to all employees? An empirical examination of alternative theories. Working paper, Stanford University and Northwestern University.
32. Rees, L., and D. Stott. 1998. The value-relevance of stock-based employee compensation disclosures. Working paper, Texas A&M University.
33. Skinner, D. 1996. Are disclosures about bank derivatives and employee stock options "value relevant"? Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 393-405.
34. Soffer, L. C. 2000. SFAS No. 123 disclosures and discounted cash flow valuation. Accounting Horizons 14: 169-189.
35. White, H. 1980. A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817-838.