Aging dynamics of heterogeneous spin models

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 22, 2003, Pages

  Montanari, Andrea ^a,c   Ricci Tersenghi, Federico ^b  

^a LABORATOIRE DE PHYSIQUE STATISTIQUE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

^c Unité Mixte de Recherche du Centre   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSICS; TIME;

EID: 0742322698     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.224429     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. L. C. E. Struick, Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978).
2. J.-P. Bouchaud, L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. Mézard, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
3. M.D. Ediger, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 99 (2000).
4. W.K. Kegel and A. van Blaaderen, Science 287, 290 (2000).
5. E.R. Weeks, J.C. Crocker, A.C. Levitt, A. Schonfield, and D.A. Weitz, Science 287, 627 (2000).
6. P.H. Poole, S.C. Glotzer, A. Coniglio, and N. Jan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3394 (1997).
7. M.D. Ediger, C.A. Angell, and S.R. Nagel, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 13 200 (1996).
8. W. Kob, C. Donati, S.J. Plimpton, P.H. Poole, and S.C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2827 (1998).
9. C. Bennemann, C. Donati, J. Baschnagel, and S.C. Glotzer, Nature (London) 399, 246 (1999).
10. F. Ricci-Tersenghi and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 62, R7567 (2000).
11. A. Barrat and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 59, R1299 (1999).
12. H.E. Castillo, C. Chamon, L.F. Cugliandolo, and M.P. Kennet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 237201 (2002).
13. C. Chamon, M.P. Kennet, H.E. Castillo, and L.F. Cugliandolo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 217201 (2002).
14. H.E. Castillo, C. Chamon, L.F. Cugliandolo, J.L. Iguain, and M.P. Kennet, Phys. B 68, 134442 (2003).
15. C. Donati, S.C. Glotzer, and P.H. Poole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5064 (1999).
16. T.R. Kirkpatrick and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. B 36, 5388 (1987).
17. J.-P. Bouchaud, L.F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. Mézard, Physica A 226, 243 (1996).
18. L. Viana and A. Bray, J. Phys. C 18, 3037 (1985).
19. Theor. Comput. Sci. 265 (1-2) 2001, special issue on Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Problems, edited by O. Dubois, R. Monasson, B. Selman, and R. Zecchina.
20. A. Montanari and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Eur. Phys. J. B 33, 339 (2003).
21. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and R. Zecchina, Science 297, 812 (2002).
22. M. Mézard and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056126 (2002).
23. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 217 (2001).
24. R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2847 (1995).
25. L.F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 173 (1993).
26. J. Kurchan, G. Parisi, and M.A. Virasoro, J. Phys. I 3, 1819 (1993).
27. A. Montanari and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 17 203 (2003).
28. S. Franz, M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1758 (1998).
29. S. Franz, M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and L. Peliti, J. Stat. Phys. 97, 459 (1999).
30. L.F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, J. Phys. A 27, 5749 (1994).
31. L.F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Philos. Mag. B 71, 501 (1995).
32. J. D. Gunton, M. San Miguel, and P. S. Sahni in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, New York, 1983), Vol. 8.
33. A.J. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
34. D.S. Fisher and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1601 (1986).
35. D.S. Fisher and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 373 (1988).
36. D.S. Fisher and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 386 (1988).
37. G.J. Koper and H.J. Hilhorst, J. Phys. (France) 49, 429 (1988).
38. L. Berthier, J.L. Barrat, and J. Kurchan, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 635 (1999).
39. A. Barrat, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3629 (1998).
40. F. Ricci-Tersenghi, M. Weigt, and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. E 63, 026702 (2001).
41. N. Creignou, and H. Daudé, Discrete Appl. Math. 96-97, 41 (1999).
42. S. Franz, M. Mézard, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, M. Weigt, and R. Zecchina, Europhys. Lett. 55, 465 (2001).
43. S. Franz, M. Leone, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and R. Zecchina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127209 (2001).
44. S. Cocco, O. Dubois, J. Mandler, and R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047205 (2003).
45. M. Mézard, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and R. Zecchina, J. Stat. Phys. 111, 505 (2003).
46. F. Guerra and F.L. Toninelli, J. Stat. Phys., to appear.
47. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, J. Stat. Phys. 111, 1 (2003).
48. G. Parisi, J. Phys. A 36, 10773 (2003).
49. G. Semerjian and L.F. Cugliandolo, Europhys. Lett. 61, 247 (2003).
50. G. Semerjian, L.F. Cugliandolo, and A. Montanari, J. Stat. Phys., to appear, cond-mat/0304333.
51. G. Semerjian and R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066103 (2003).
52. W. Barthel, A.K. Hartmann, and M. Weigt, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066104 (2003).
53. L.F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. E 55, 3898 (1997).
54. M. Mezard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
55. A. Montanari (unpublished).
56. R. Exartier and L. Peliti, Eur. Phys. J. B 16, 119 (2000).
57. A. Garriga and F. Ritort, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 105 (2001).
58. L.F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2390 (1996).
59. L.F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 407 (1997).
60. R. Monasson, J. Phys. A 31, 513 (1998).
61. A. M. Khorunzhy, B. A. Khoruzhenko, L. A. Pastur, and M. V. Shcherbina, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, New York, 1992), Vol. 15.
62. I. M. Gel’fand and G.E. Shilov, Generalized Functions (Academic Press, New York, 1964).
63. The complete specification of the samples used in our simulations is available, upon request to one of the authors.
64. erg(N) ergodicity is reestablished and the system equilibrates.
65. The pure power-law behavior (Formula presented) is probably modified by logarithms in d = 2.38
66. w). We say that they begin to violate FDT “together” if (Formula presented) being the appropriate time parametrization function].
67. 4.
68. 2) ≈ 1.
69. A similar statement appears in Ref.58. Notice however two differences: the cited authors consider correlation functions for different modes in Fourier space, while we consider different sites; more important, they take the average over quenched disorder, while we consider a fixed realization of the disorder (our statement would be trivial if we took the disorder average).
70. w) are the correlation and response functions for the observable of the thermometer which is coupled to the system.