Perceived Image Contrast and Observer Preference II. Empirical Modeling of Perceived Image Contrast and Observer Preference Data

Journal of Imaging Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 494-508

  Calabria, Anthony J ^a   Fairchild, Mark D ^b  

^a Sun Chemical Corporation   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; IMAGE QUALITY; LUMINESCENCE; VISION;

IMAGE CONTRAST; IMAGE MANIPULATION;

COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 0742320711     PISSN: 10623701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. H. De Ridder, Naturalness and Image Quality: Saturation and lightness variation in color images, J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 40(6), 487-493, (1996).
2. P. G. Engeldrum, Extending Image Quality Models, Proc. IS&T's 2002 PICS Conference, IS&T, Springfield, VA, 2002, pp. 65-69.
3. L. Stroebel, J. Compton, I. Current, and R, Zakia, Photographic Materials and Processes, Focal Press, Boston, MA, 1986.
4. P. A. Mlsna, Q. Zhang, J. J. Rodriguez, 3-D histogram modification of color images, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 1015-1018 (1996).
5. J. Tubmlin, J. K. Hodgins and B. K. Guenter, Two methods for display of high contrast images, ACM Trans. Graphics, 18(1), 56-94 (1999).
6. A. J. Calabria and M. D. Fairchild, Perceived image contrast and observer preference I. The effects of lightness, chroma, and sharpness manipulations on contrast perception, J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 47, 479-493 (2003)
7. M. D. Fairchild and E. Pirotta, Predicting the lightness of chromatic object colors using CIELAB, Color Res. Appl. 16(6), 385-393 (1991).