MR Arthrography: A proposal for solution optimization with lidocaine. An in vitro experience;Artro-RM: Proposta di ottimizzazione della soluzione con lidocaina: Esperienza in vitro

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 106, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 489-496

  Genovese, Eugenio ^a   Callegari, Leonardo ^a   Magenta Biasina, Alberto ^b   Angeretti, Maria Gloria ^a   Sosto, Pasquale ^a   Faletti, Carlo ^c   Fugazzola, Carlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c CTO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Gadolinium (Gd DTPA); Lidocaine; MR Arthrography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; LIDOCAINE;

ANESTHESIA MECHANISM; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DILUTION; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IODINATION; JOINT CAPSULE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISCOSITY;

ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ARTHROGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; LIDOCAINE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0742318973     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Applegate GR, Flannigan BD, Tolin BS, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W: MR diagnosis of recurrent tears in the knee: value of intraarticular contrast material. AJR 161: 821-825, 1993.
2. Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, De Bernardino T et al: Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MR imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthography. AJR 161: 1229-1235, 1993.
3. Cotten A, Jacobsen J, Brossmann J et al: MR arthrography of the elbow: normal anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21: 516-522, 1997.
4. Engel A, Kramer J, Stiglbauer R et al: Articular cartilage dafect detectability in human knees with MR arthrography. Eur Radiol 3: 161-165, 1993.
5. Faletti C, De Stefano N, Regis G et al: Magnetic resonance arthrography. Preliminary experience in study technique and main diagnostic applications. Radiol Med 89: 211-214, 1995.
6. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP et al: Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthrography. AJR 163: 629-636, 1994.
7. Garcia J: MR arthrography. J Radiol 81: 945-952, 2000.
8. Giovagnoni A, Valeri G, Ercolani P et al: Magnetic resonance arthrography in chondral disease of the knee. Radiol Med 90: 219-225, 1995.
9. Helgason JW, Chandnani VP, Yu JS: MR arthrography: a review of current technique and applications. AJR 163: 1473-1480, 1997.
10. Kramer J, Stiglbauer R, Engel A et al: MR contrast arthrography in osteochondrosis dissecans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 254-260, 1992.
11. Loew R, Kreitner KF, Runkel M et al: MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging. Eur Radiol 10: 989-996, 2000.
12. Grainger AJ, Elliott JM, Campbell RS et al: Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use. Clin Radiol 55: 163-176, 2000.
13. Peh WC, Cassar-Pullicino VN: Magnetic Resonance arthrography: current status. Clin Radiol 54: 575-587, 1999.
14. Trattnig S, Breitenseher M, Rand T et al: MR imaging guided MR arthrography of the shoulder: clinical experience on a conventional closed high-field system. AJR 172: 1572-1574, 1999.
15. Sciulli RL, Boutin RD, Brown RR et al: Evaluation of the postoperative meniscus of the knee: a study comparing conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging. MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material, and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material. Skeletal Radiol 28: 508-514, 1999.
16. Rand T, Freilinger W, Breitenseher M et al: Magnetic Resonance arthrography (MRA) in the postoperative shoulder. Magn Res Imaging 17: 843-850, 1999.
17. Brossmann J, Preidler KW, Daenen B et al: Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthography in cadavers, Radiology 200: 509-517, 1996.
18. Engel A: Magnetic Resonance knee arthrography. Acta Orthop Scand 61 (S240): 1-57, 1990.
19. Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D et al: Subscapularis tendon tears: detection and grading at MR arthrography. Radiology 213: 709-714, 1999.
20. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C et al: Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR 170: 1557-1561, 1998.
21. Zanetti M, Hodler J: Contrast media in MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: intra-articular gadopentetate vs saline: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 7: 498-502, 1997.
22. Brown RR, Clarke DW, Daffner RH: Is a mixture of gadolinium and iodinated contrast material safe during MR arthrography? AJR 175: 1087-1090, 2000.
23. De Venuto F, Busse KR, Zegna AI: Viscosity of human blood hemodiluted with crystalline hemoglobin solution. Transfusion 21: 752-756, 1981.
24. Nagelschmidt M: Endoscopic use of fibrin adhesives: problems when injecting through long catheters. Surg Endosc 13: 80-82, 1999.
25. Hilfiker PR, Weishaupt D, Schmid M et al: Real-time MR guided joint puncture and arthrography: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 9: 201-204, 1999.
26. Kramer J, Recht MP, Imhof H et al: Postcontrast MR anthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18: 218-224, 1994.
27. Rand T, Brossmann J, Pedowitz R et al: Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers. Acta Radiol 41: 492-497, 2000.
28. Jinkins JR, Robinson JW, Sisk L et al: Proton relaxation enhancement associated with iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging of the CNS. AJNR 13: 19-27, 1992.
29. Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U et al: MR arthrography of the shoulder with gadopentetate dimeglumine: influence of concentration, iodinated contrast material and time on signal intensity. AJR 163: 621-623, 1994.
30. Engel A, Hamilton G, Hajek P et al: In vitro uptake of 153Gadolinium and Gadolinium complexes by hyaline articular cartilage. Eu J Radiology 11: 104-106, 1990.
31. Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ, Gylys-Morin V et al: The effect of intraarticular gadolinium-DTPA on synovial membrane and cartilage. Invest Radiol 25: 179-183, 1990.
32. Railhac JJ, Brekke O: Iopentol (Imagopaque 300) compared with ioxaglate (Hexabrix 320) in knee arthrography. A clinical trial assessing immediate and late adverse events and diagnostic information. Eur Radiol 7: S135-S139, 1997.
33. Miller TT: MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip after fluoroscopic land-marking. Skeletal Radiol 29: 81-84, 2000.
34. Valls R, Melloni P: Sonographic guidance of needle position for MR arthrography of the shoulder. AJR 169: 845-847, 1997.
35. Trattnig S, Breitenseher M, Pretterklieber M et al: MRI guided MRI arthrography of the shoulder. Radiologe 36: 709-712, 1996.
36. DeMouy EH, Menendez CV Jr, Bodin CJ: Palpation-directed (non fluoroscopically guided) saline-enhanced MR arthrography of the shoulder. AJR 169: 229-231, 1997.
37. Braunstein EM, Cardinal E, Buckwalter KA et al: Bupivicaine arthrography of the post-arthroplasty hip. Skeletal Radiol 24: 519-521, 1995.