Controversies and Legal Issues of Prescribing and Dispensing Medications Using the Internet

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 188-194

  Fung, Constance H ^a,b,d   Woo, Hawkin E ^b,c   Asch, Steven M ^a,b  

^a VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILDENAFIL;

AGED; CASE REPORT; CONSUMER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG MARKETING; E-MAIL; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERNET; LAW SUIT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; ONLINE SYSTEM; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHARMACY; PHYSICIAN; PRESCRIPTION; REVIEW;

EID: 0742306499     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4065/79.2.188     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Kahan SE, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Sildenafil and the Internet. J Urol. 2000;163:919-923.
2. Tech reports: self-medication and the threat to legal health. Leg Times. June 5, 2000:29.
3. Grossman M, Hift AK. Cyber law. Broward Daily Bus Rev. May 23, 2000; sect A:1.
4. Yen H. Pa. sues online companies for selling prescription drugs without licenses. Leg Intelligencer. May 4, 2000:3.
5. Korenchuk K. In focus: food & drug law: online pharmacies present a host of regulatory issues. Natl Law J. November 29, 1999:B11.
6. Stovall C. Internet fraud and abuse: Kansas takes on fraudulent cyberspace doctors and pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. September 1999:1.
7. Under examination. Med Malpract Law Strategy. 1999;16(5):14.
8. Casey M. Managed care news perspectives: can e-pharmacies survive the onslaught of intense competition and Wall Street demands? Med Ind Today. November 14, 2000.
9. Research news: funding: drug safety, Internet policing top FDA agenda. Med Lett CDC & FDA. March 13, 2000.
10. Websites selling drugs to be regulated. Econ Times. December 29, 1999.
11. Clinton unveils plan to fight illegal Internet drug sales. Med Ind Today. December 29, 1999.
12. Clinton proposes initiative curbing illegal Internet prescription drug sales. AFX Europe. December 28, 1999.
13. Casey M. Managed care news perspectives: 'Dot Com' purchase spells early lead for CVS. Med Ind Today. May 21, 1999.
14. Drug and biotechnology news: Internet-based pharmacies raising regulatory questions. Med Ind Today. April 7, 1999.
15. Payer and provider news: new Internet pharmacy launches with top partners. Med Ind Today. February 26, 1999.
16. Florida and Washington sue online Cipro sellers. Consum Prot Rep. January 2002:21.
17. What's inside. Pharm Litigation Reporter. 2002;17(11):1.
18. Consumer fraud: New Jersey v. Pillbox Pharmacy, NJ. sues cyber-drugstore for consumer fraud. Pharm Litigation Reporter. 2001;17(7):12.
19. Internet fraud and abuse: Arizona files suit against online pharmacy. Consum Prot Rep. July 2000:21.
20. Internet fraud and abuse: Pennsylvania settles with online pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. November 2000:18.
21. Internet fraud and abuse: Texas sues online pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. September 2000;19.
22. Internet fraud and abuse: West Virginia sues online pharmacy. Consum Prot Rep. September 2000:20.
23. Consumer fraud: Arizona v. T.A.C.E., Ariz. Atty. Gen. sues to stop Internet sale of Xenical, other Rx drugs. Diet Drugs Litigation Reporter. August 2000;3(11):7.
24. Consumer fraud: Arizona v. A Fresh Life Inc., Internet company charged with illegally selling Viagra prescriptions. Pharm Litigation Reporter. 2000;16(3):6.
25. Internet fraud and abuse: Kansas files suit against drug company. Consum Prot Rep. March 1999:28.
26. Federal legislation: Attorney General Stovall testifies on Internet pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. March 2000:30.
27. Internet fraud and abuse: Michigan files notices of intended action against online pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. January 2000:21.
28. Pharmacies: In re Doctors A.S.A.P. Inc., MI orders online pharmacies to stop filling prescriptions. Pharm Litigation Reporter. 2000;15(8):6.
29. Pharmacies: Missouri ex rel. Nison v. Stallknecht, states act to ban online pharmacies. Pharm Litigation Reporter. 1999;15(7):6.
30. Litigation: net clash. Natl Law J. November 8, 1999:B17.
31. Internet fraud and abuse: Missouri stops illegal online pharmacy and clinic. Consum Prot Rep. November 1999:20.
32. Illinois sues to block Internet pharmacies. Daily Record. October 25,1999:2a.
33. Internet fraud and abuse: Missouri obtains TROs against online pharmacy. Consum Prot Rep. July 1999:21.
34. Mckee M. Online Viagra raising questions. Recorder. May 21, 1998:1.
35. Medical malpractice law & strategy: criminal prosecution MD gets probation, fine for drugs on net. Diet Drugs Litigation Reporter. August 2000;17(10):1.
36. Cigna mail-order prescription center Web site. Available at: https://teldrug.healthcare.cigna.com/healthcare/teldrug/app /public/PrescriptionCenter.jsp. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
37. Discountprescriptioncenter.com Web site. Available at: http://discountprescriptioncenter.com. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
38. Gallagher JC, Colaizzi JL. Issues in Internet pharmacy practice. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1483-1485.
39. Tumolo J. Facts about Web pharmacies. Adv Nurse Pract. 2001;9:23-24.
40. Statement of Peter M. Neupert, President and Chief Executive Officer, Drugstore.com, regarding the benefits of online pharmacies before the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Washington, DC. March 21, 2000.
41. Healthcare supply chain/purchasing: independent pharmacies now can become online superstores. Med Ind Today. March 1, 2000.
42. Roller K. Expanding online pharmacies encounter growing pains. Drug Store News. 2000;22(12):48.
43. Consumer advice: buying drugs online. Harv Health Lett. June 2000;25:1-3.
44. Henney JE. Cyberpharmacies and the role of the US Food and Drug Administration. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(1):E3.
45. Be WWWary of Internet drugs. Heart Advis. August 2002;5:4-5.
46. Drugstore.com: your health & beauty superstore Web site. Available at: www.drugstore.com. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
47. Brushwood DB. Responsive regulation of Internet pharmacy practice. Ann Health Law. 2001;10:75-103.
48. Consumer Union of U.S., Inc. Relief for the Rx blues: long waits at the drugstore? incomplete advice? high prices? we prescribe this report. Consum Rep. 1999;64:38-46.
49. Bloom BS, Iannacone R. Internet availability of prescription pharmaceuticals to the public. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:830-833.
50. Fischman J. Drug bazaar: getting medicine off the Web is easy, but dangerous. US News World Rep. 1999;126:58-62.
51. Hazlet TK, Bach MH. The Internet, confidentiality, and the pharmacy.coms. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. Spring 2001;10:157-160.
52. Landis NT. Virtual pharmacies boast easy access, privacy safeguards. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1174, 1177-1179.
53. Peterson AM. A survey of selected Internet pharmacies in the United States. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001;41:205-212.
54. Wagner ML, Alonso J, Mehlhorn AJ. Comparison of Internet and community pharmacies. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:116-119.
55. Zeman SE. Regulation of online pharmacies: a case for cooperative federalism. Ann Health Law. 2001;10:105-137.
56. Casey M. Managed care news perspectives: the Internet writes its own prescription. Med Ind Today. March 24, 1999.
57. Drug and biotechnology news: patients to control health with help of Internet pharmacy. Med Ind Today. January 7, 1999.
58. Henney JE, Shuren JE, Nightingale SL, McGinnis TJ. Internet purchase of prescription drugs: buyer beware. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:861-862.
59. Friedman KM. Internet prescribing limitations and alternatives. Ann Health Law. 2001;10:139-178.
60. Drug Enforcement Agency. Dispensing and purchasing controlled substances over the Internet. Federal Reg. April 27, 2001;66:21181-21184. Available at: www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs /notices/2001/fr0427.htm. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
61. Pear R. US and Thai officials attack Internet sales of medicine. New York Times. March 21, 2000; sect A:18.
62. Young D. VIPPS program suspends online pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58:1786, 1788.
63. Paulsen M. New NABP program combines criteria, inspections to certify online pharmacy quality. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1999;39:870.
64. Oliver AJ. Internet pharmacies: regulation of a growing industry. J Law Med Ethics. 2000;28:98-101.
65. Thompson CA. Internet-based prescribing and dispensing trouble medical and pharmacy boards. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:500-501.
66. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. VIPPS database search results. Available at: www.nabp.net/vipps/consumer /listall.asp. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
67. Atkinson H. Online pharmacies. Health News. March 1999;5:2.
68. Employers urged to monitor access to Internet pharmacies. Workplace Subst Abuse Advis. 2002;16(14).
69. McGuire D. Cipro crackdown won't be the last. Available at: www.newsbytes.com. Accessed January 16, 2002.
70. Expanded reporting: anthrax: study finds outbreak of Cipro Web sites followed mail attacks. Med Lett CDC & FDA. October 13, 2002.
71. US General Accounting Office. Internet Pharmacies-Adding Disclosure Requirements Would Aid State and Federal Oversight. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; October 2000. Publication GAO-01-69.
72. Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Asch DA. Direct sale of sildenafil (Viagra) to consumers over the Internet. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1389-1392.
73. Henkel J. It's convenient and private, but beware of 'rogue sites.' FDA Consum. 2000;34:24-29.
74. Opderbeck DW. How should FDA regulate prescription drug promotion on the Internet? Food Drug Law J. 1998;53:47-61.
75. Landis NT. Congress explores limits on Internet pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1812.
76. Rost KT. Policing the "wild west" world of Internet pharmacies. Food Drug Law J. 2000;55:619-639.
77. Stolfi P. Caveat emptor: regulating the online medicine man in the new frontier. J Contemp Health Law Policy. Winter 2000;17:377-401.
78. Henney JE, Shuren JE. Direct sale of sildenafil (Viagra) to consumers over the Internet [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:740, 742.
79. Clevenger T. Internet pharmacies: cyberspace versus the regulatory state. J Law Health. 2000-2001;15(2):165-187.
80. Lowes R. Are online pharmacies good for your patients-and for you? Med Econ. 2000;77:77-80, 84-86.
81. Dickens P. Seniors tempted to buy cheaper reimported drugs get a warning. Daily Record. August 30,2002.
82. Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Health-Care Poll. Buying drugs outside the U.S. Wall Street Journal. October 21, 2003.
83. US Food and Drug Administration. Statement of William K. Hubbard, Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Legislation, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives. June 7, 2001. Available at: www.fda.gov/ola/2001 /drugimport0607.html. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
84. US Food and Drug Administration. International Prescription Drug Parity; Are Americans Being Protected or Gouged? Statement of William K. Hubbard, Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation, before the Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, US House of Representatives. April 3, 2003. Available at: www .fda.gov/ola/2003/internetsales0403.html. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
85. US Food and Drug Administration. South Florida Access to Affordable Prescription Drugs: Costs and Benefits of Alternative Solutions. Statement of John M. Taylor, Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives. March 10, 2003. Available at: www .fda.gov/ola/2003/southfl0310.html. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
86. Blumberg MA. Information on importation of drugs. Prepared by the Division of Import Operations and Policy. US Food and Drug Administration, Office of Regulatory Affairs Imports; April 3, 1998. Available at: www.fda.gov/ora/import/pipinfo.htm. Accessed October 20, 2003.
87. Termini RB. Regulation and enforcement: who should mind the Internet drugstore? Pharm Med Device. 2002;2(7): 1.
88. Scheineson MJ. PracticeFocus: ready to regulate, FDA goes online, agency has dropped hands-off approach to Web pharmacies. Leg Times. June 19, 2000:25.
89. Sellers JA. Internet pharmacies. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57:643.
90. DEA addresses queries about Internet pharmacies. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;219:423-424.
91. Spears C. Consumer protection: online sale of prescription drugs to minors not unconscionable. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30:315-317.
92. Rice B. Online prescribing: the growing problem of online pharmacies. Med Econ. 2001;78:40, 42, 45.
93. Rice B. Online prescribing: how one doctor got caught. Med Econ. 2001;78:32-34, 39.
94. Prescription drugs, online pharmacy, doctor charged with deception in sale of Cipro. Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter. 2002;7(7):10.
95. Silverman RD. Regulating medical practice in the cyber age: issues and challenges for state medical boards. Am J Law Med. 2000;26:255-276.
96. Internet fraud and abuse: Connecticut sues Internet pharmacies. Consum Prot Rep. May 2001:18.
97. State alleges illegal sales. Conn Law Trib. May 14, 2001.
98. Federation of State Medical Boards Web site. Model guidelines for the appropriate use of the Internet in medical practice. Available at: www.fsmb.org. Accessed June 2, 2002.
99. Adams D. California fines out-of-state doctors for prescribing: more medical boards may start crossing state lines to police online prescribing. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2003/03 /03/prsb0303.htm. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
100. American Medical Association House of Delegates. Guidelines for medical practice through the Internet. Resolution 832 (A-99). Available at: www.ama-assn.org/meetings/public/annual99/reports /onsite/word7/h832.doc. Accessibility verified December 5, 2003.
101. Eysenbach G. Online prescriptions of pharmaceuticals: where is the evidence for harm or for benefit? a call for papers-and for reflection [editorial]. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:E1.