Models of throughput rates for dictation and voice spelling for handheld devices

International Journal of Speech Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 69-79

  Commarford, Patrick M ^a   Lewis, James R ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

Dictation; Personal digital assistant (PDA); Speech interface; Voice spelling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

HANDHELD DEVICES; HANDWRITING RECOGNIZERS; SPEECH INTERFACE; VOICE SPELLING;

PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS;

EID: 0742304039     PISSN: 13812416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:IJST.0000004809.33755.b7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Card, S.J., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Kleid, N.A. and Bonto, M.A. (1995). Handwriting Recognition and Soft Keyboard Study. (Tech. Report 29.3008), Raleigh, NC: International Business Machines Corp.
3. Koester, H.H. (2001). User performance with speech recognition: A literature review. Assistive Technology, 13:116-130.
4. Lewis, J.R. (1999). Effect of error correction strategy on speech dictation throughput. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 457-461.
5. Lewis, J.R. (2001). The Accuracy Wars: Journalists' Estimates of Continuous Speech Product Dictation Accuracy from 1997-1999 (Tech. Report 29.3465). Raleigh, NC: International Business Machines Corp.
6. Lewis, J.R. and Commarford, P.M. (2002). Developing and Tuning a Voice Spelling Alphabet for Devices with Small Displays. (Tech. Report 29.3517). Raleigh, NC: International Business Machines Corp.
7. MacKenzie, S.I. and Chang, L. (1999). A performance comparison of two handwriting recognizers. Interacting with Computers, 11:283-297.
8. MacKenzie, S.I., Nonnecke, R.B., McQueen, J.C., Riddersma, S., and Meltz, M. (1994). A comparison of three methods of character entry on pen-based computers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 330-334.
9. MacKenzie, S.I. and Zhang, S.X. (1997). The immediate usability of Graffiti. Proceedings of Graphics Interface '97, Toronto, Canada: Canadian Information Processing Society, pp. 129-137.
10. MacKenzie, S.I., Zhang, S.X., and Soukoreff, R.F. (1999). Text entry using soft keyboards. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18:235-244.
11. Marklin, R. W., Simoneau, G.G., and Hoffman, D. (1998). Effects of computer keyboard setup parameters and user's anthropometric characteristics on wrist deviation and typing efficiency. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 876-880.
12. Norman, D.A. and Fisher, D. (1982). Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: Keyboard layout doesn't much matter. Human Factors, 24:509-519.
13. Sears, A. and Arora, R. (2001). An evaluation of gesture recognition for PDAs. In M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, and R.J. Koubek (Eds.), Usability Evaluation and Interface Design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents and Virtual Reality, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1-5.
14. Soukoreff, R.W. and MacKenzie, S.I. (1995). Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and soft keyboard. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14:370-379.
15. Zha, Y. and Sears, A. (2001). Data entry for mobile devices using soft keyboards: Understanding the effect of keyboard size. In M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, and R.J. Koubek (Eds.), Usability Evaluation and Interface Design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents and Virtual Reality, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 16-20.