Lotteries, Litigation, and Education Finance

Southern Economic Journal

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 584-599

  Dee, Thomas S ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742288788     PISSN: 00384038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4135332     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aaronson, Daniel. 1999. The effect of school finance reform on population heterogeneity. National Tax Journal 52:5-30.
2. Borg, Mary O., Paul M. Mason, and Stephen L. Shapiro. 1991. The economic consequences of state lotteries. New York: Praeger Publishers.
3. Burtless, Gary. 1996. Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Byron, Kris, and Gary T. Henry. 1999. Report on the expenditure of the lottery fund, fiscal year 1996. Council on School Performance, Georgia State University.
5. Card, David, and A. Abigail Payne. 2002. School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics 83:49-82.
6. Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook. 1989. Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Clotfelter, Charles T. 1994. Review of: The economic consequences of state lotteries. Journal of Economic Literature 32:147-8.
8. Cohn, Elchanan. 1984. Equity effects of the Educational Finance Act in South Carolina. Economics of Education Review 3:333-9.
9. Cohn, Elchanan, and Sam Cooper. 1994. Equity and efficiency of state lotteries: Review essay. Economics of Education Review 13:355-62.
10. Dee, Thomas S. 2000. The capitalization of education finance reforms. Journal of Law and Economics 43:185-214.
11. Dee, Thomas S., William N. Evans, and Sheila E. Murray. 1999. Data watch: Research data in the economics of education. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13:205-16.
12. Evans, William N., Sheila E. Murray, and Robert Schwab. 1997. Schoolhouses, courthouses and statehouses after Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16:10-31.
13. Fisher, Ronald C., and Leslie E. Papke. 2000. Local government responses to education grants. National Tax Journal 53:153-68.
14. Flanigan, Jackson L., and Michael D. Richardson. 1994. The changing face of educational reform: A financial view from South Carolina. International Journal of Educational Reform 3:320-6.
15. Fowler, William J. 1990. Financial accounting for local and stale school systems, 1990. Report No. NCES 90-096. Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
16. Goldhaber, Dan, and Karen Callahan. 2001. Impact of the Basic Education Program on educational spending and equity in Tennessee. Journal of Education Finance 26:415-36.
17. Green, Harry A. 1997. Education finance reform in Tennessee. Educational Considerations 25:39-41.
18. Guryan, Jonathan. 2001. Does money matter? Regression-discontinuity estimates from education finance reform in Massachusetts. NBER Working Paper No. 8269.
19. Herrington, Carolyn D., and Peter J. Cistone. 1994. Educational reform in Florida: Context, substance and politics. International Journal of Educational Reform 3:264-78.
20. Hines, James R., and Richard H. Thaler. 1995. Anomalies: The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9:217-26.
21. Holmes. C. Thomas, and John Dayton. 1997. Financing public elementary and secondary education in Georgia. Educational Considerations 25:21-4.
22. Lankford, Hamilton, and James Wyckoff. 1995. Where has the money gone? An analysis of school district spending in New York. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17:195-218.
23. Mesibov, Laurie L. 1995. State and local government relations in elementary and secondary education. School Law Bulletin 26:10-25.
24. Moulton, Brent R. 1990. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics 72:334-8.
25. Murray, Sheila E., William N. Evans, and Robert Schwab. 1998. Education finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review 88:789-812.
26. O'Leary, Michael, and Jay Moskowitz. 1997. Proposed "good practices" for creating data bases from the F-33 and CCD for school finance analyses. In Selected papers in school finance. 1995. Report No. NCES 97-536. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center of Education Statistics, pp. 83-97.
27. Poterba, James M. 1997. Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16:48-66.
28. Price, Donald I., and Shawn E. Novak. 1999. The tax incidence of three Texas lottery games: Regressivity, race, and education. National Tax Journal 52:741-51.
29. Rothstein, Richard, and Karen Hawley Miles. 1995. Where's the money gone? Changes in the level and composition of education spending. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
30. Spindler, Charles J. 1995. The lottery and education: Robbing Peter to pay Paul? Public Budgeting and Finance 15:54-62.
31. Verstegen, Deborah A. 1994. The new wave of school finance litigation. Phi Delta Kappan 76:243-50.
32. White, Betsy, and Charles Walston. 1994. Politics seen in school grant allocations. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 4 February, p. 1.