Reactivity of the Ductus Arteriosus: Implications for Transcatheter Therapy

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 268-270

  Lozier, John S ^a   Cowley, Collin G ^a,b  

^a PRIMARY CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac catheterization; Patent ductus arteriosus

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART MURMUR; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MALE; PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSCATHETER CLOSURE; TRANSCATHETER COIL OCCLUSION;

BALLOON OCCLUSION; CORONARY VASOSPASM; DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS, PATENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0742287890     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10760     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cambier PA, Kirby WC, Wortham DC, Moore JW. Percutaneous closure of the small (less than 2.5 mm) patent ductus arteriosus using coil embolization. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:815-816.
2. Patel HT, Cao QL, Rhodes J, Hijazi ZM. Long-term outcome of transcatheter coil closure of small to large patent ductus arteriosus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;47:457-461.
3. Shapiro W, Said S, Nova P. Intermittent disappearance of the murmur of patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation 1960;24:1235-1238.
4. Verma R, Presti S, Danilowicz D. The intermittent ductus revisited: echocardiographic evidence and successful coil occlusion-a case report and review of literature. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;45:260-263.
5. Kohler C, McNamara D. Elongated ductus arteriosus with intermittent shunting. Pediatrics 1967;39:446-448.
6. Keith T, Sagarminaga J. Spontaneously disappearing murmur of patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation 1961;24:1235-1238.
7. Dubrow I, Fisher E, Hastreiter A. Intermittent functional closure of patent ductus arteriosus in a ten-month-old infant; hemodynamic documentation. Chest 1975;68:110-113.
8. Tomita H, Fuse S, Chiba S. Catecholamine-induced ductus arteriosus constriction in children. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1372-1375.
9. Friedberg D, Rajpal R, Litwin S, Zondlo J. Persistent reactivity of patent ductus with a review of the mechanism of spontaneous closure. Am J Dis Child 1981;135:472-473.
10. Tomita H, Fuse S, Chiba S. Factors that predict epinephrine induced constriction of the persistent arterial duct. Cardiol Young 1998;8:195-198.
11. Overmeire Bv, Smets K, Lecoutere D, Broek HVd, Weyler J, Groote KD, Langhendries J. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. N Engl J Med 2000;343:674-681.
12. Hosking MC, Benson LN, Musewe N, Dyck JD, Freedom RM. Transcatheter occlusion of the persistently patent ductus arteriosus: forty-month follow-up and prevalence of residual shunting. Circulation 1991;84:2313-2317.
13. European Registry. Transcatheter occlusion of persistent arterial duct. Lancet 1992;340:1062-1066.
14. Latson LA. Residual shunts after transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: a major concern or benign "techno-malady"? Circulation 1991;84:2591-2593.