Thick modeling

Economic Modelling

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 323-343

  Granger, Clive W J ^a   Jeon, Yongil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Combination forecasting; Large model forecasting; Thick modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742285212     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0264-9993(03)00017-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bates J.M. Granger C.W.J. The combination of forecasts Oper. Res. Quart. 20 1969 451-468
2. Benkwitz A. Lütkepohl H. Neumann M.H. Problems related to confidence intervals for impulse responses of autoregressive processes Econ. Rev. 19 2000 69-103
3. Berkowitz J. Kilian L. Recent development in bootstrapping time series Economet. Rev. 19 2000 1-48
4. Breiman L. Bagging predictors Mach. Learn. 26 1996 123-140
5. Breiman, L., 1999. Using Adaptive Bagging to Debias Regressions. Department of Statistics, University of California-Berkeley Technical Report 547
6. Burns S.T. The interpretation and use of economic predictions Proc. R. Soc. A 307 1986 103-125
7. Church K.B. Mitchell P.R. Sault J.E. Wallis K.F. Comparative properties of models of the UK economy Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev. 161 1997 91-100
8. Chan Y.-L. Stock J.H. Watson M.W. A dynamic factor model framework for forecast combination Spanish Econ. Rev. 1 1999 91-122
9. Clemens R.T. Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography Int. J. Forecasting 5 1989 559-584
10. Gallo, G.M., Granger, C.W.J., Jeon, Y., 1999. The Impact of the Use of Forecasts in Information Sets. To appear, IMF Staff Papers
11. Granger, C.W.J., 2000. An overview of nonlinear macroeconomic empirical models. To appear, Journal of Dynamic Macroeconomics, in press
12. Granger C.W.J. Ramanathan R. Improved methods of combining forecasts J. Forecasting 3 1984 197-204
13. Klein L.R. Comparative Performance of U.S. Econometric Models 1991 Oxford University Press
14. Kozicki S. How useful are Taylor rules for monetary policy? Economic Review 1999 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
15. Leamer E.E. Let's take the con out of econometrics Am. Econ. Rev. 73 1983 31-43
16. Leamer E.E. Leonard H. Reporting the fragility of regression estimates Rev. Econ. Stat. 65 1983 306-317
17. Magnus R.J. Morgan M.S. Methodology and Tacit Knowledge. Two Experiments in Econometrics 1999 Wiley Chicago
18. McCloskey D. Thick and thin methodologies in the history of economic thought de Marchi N. The Popperian Legacy in Economics 1988 Cambridge University Press chapter 10
19. Politis D. Romano J.P. The stationary bootstrap J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89 1994 1303-1313
20. Rosenfeld J. The butterfly that roared Sci. Am. Presents Weather 11 2000 22-27
21. Runkle D.E. Vector autoregressions and reality J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5 1987 437-442
22. Shiller, R.J., 1991. Model comparisons and appraisal. Chapter 12 of Klein, L.R. (1991). Comparative Performance of U.S. Econometric Models, Oxford University Press
23. Smith R. Emergent policy-making with macro-econometric models Econ. Model. 15 1998 429-442
24. Stanley T.D. Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review J. Econ. Perspect. 15 3 2001 131-150
25. Stock, J.W., Watson, M.W., 1999. A comparison of linear and nonlinear univariate models for forecasting macroeconomic time series. Chapter 1 of Engle, R.F., White, H., (1999). Cointegration, Causality, and Forecasting. Oxford University Press
26. Stock J.W. Watson M.W. Forecasting inflation J. Monetary Econ. 44 1999 293-335
27. Taylor, J.B., 1993. Discretion versus Policy Rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214