Feminist issues in e-mail group discussion among cancer patients

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 287-298

  Im, Eun Ok ^a   Chee, Wonshik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; E mail; Group discussion; Pain; Research

Indexed keywords

CANCER PAIN; CANCER PATIENT; E-MAIL; GENDER; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; REVIEW; ADULT; ARTICLE; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; FEMINISM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FEMALE; FEMINISM; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0742273086     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200310000-00006     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Mavis BE, Brocato JJ. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited. Eval Health Prof. 1998;21395-408.
2. Kollock P, Smith MA. Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge; 1999.
3. Fawcett J, Buhle EL Jr. Using the Internet for data collection. An innovative electronic strategy. Comput Nurs. 1995;3:273-279.
4. Frandsen JL. The use of computers in cancer pain management. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1997;13:49-56.
5. Lakeman R. Using the Internet for data collection in nursing research. Comput Nurs. 1997;15:269-275.
6. Lakeman R. The internet: facilitating an international nursing culture for psychiatric nurses. Comput Nurs. 1998;16:87-89.
7. Murray PJ, Anthony DM. Nursing e-journals: are current models using the web's potential? Medinfo. 1998;9:135-139.
8. Duffy ME. A critique of research: a feminist perspective. Health Care Women Int. 1985;6:341-352.
9. Ford-Gilboe M, Campbell J. The mother-headed single-parent family: a feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44:173-183.
10. McCormick N, Leonard J. Gender and sexuality in the cyberspace frontier. Women Ther. 1996;19:109-119.
11. Im E-O, Chee W. Internet survey on cancer pain. In review.
12. Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1990.
13. Hall JM, Stevens PE. Rigor in feminist research. Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;13:16-29.
14. Olesen V. Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
15. Wuest J. Removing the shackles: a feminist critique of noncompliance. Nurs Outlook. 1993;41:217-224.
16. Hess B. Beyond dichotomy: drawing distinctions and embracing differences. Sociol Forum. 1990;5:75-94.
17. Jones R, Pitt N. Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email, and World Wide Web methods. Occup Med Lond. 1990;49:556-558.
18. Paolo AM, Bonaminio GA, Gibson C, Partridge T, Kallail K. Response rate comparisons of e-mail and mail-distributed student evaluations. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12:281-284.
19. Cyber Dialogue. American Internet User Survey [online]. Available at: http://www.cyberdialogue.com/news/release/1998/01-27-aius-growth.html. Accessed September 2003.
20. Kroll E. The Whole Internet: Users Guide and Catalog. Sebastopol, Calif: O'Reilly & Associates; 1992.
21. Kendall L. "Oh no! I'm a nerd!": hegemonic masculin-ity on an online forum. Gender Soc. 2000;14:256-274.
22. Han HR, Belcher AE. Computer-mediated support group use among parents of children with cancer - an exploratory study. Comput Nurs. 2001;19:27-33.
23. Beck CT. Qualitative research: the evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15:263-266.
24. Curl M, Robinson DK. Handheld computers in clinical audit: a comparison with established pen and paper method. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1997;7:16-20.
25. Comley P. The use of Internet as a data collection method. Paper presented at: ESOMAR; 1996 Edinburg.
26. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Poll analysis: January 27, 1999. A survey methods comparison. Available at: http://www.people-press. org/onlinerpt.htm. Accessed 2001.
27. Frankel MS, Siang S. Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. Available at: http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/ intres/report.pdf. Accessed 1999.