Accommodative response to PRIO® Computer Vision Tester versus printed text

Optometry

Volumn 74, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 782-786

  Sorkin, Richard E ^a,b   Reich, Lewis N ^a   Pizzimenti, Joseph ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodative response; Gaussian image; Low neutral retinoscopy; Monocular Estimation Method (MEM); PRIO Computer Vision Tester; Video display terminal (VDT)

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; RETINOSCOPY; VIDEORECORDING; VISION TEST;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; COMPUTER TERMINALS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; PRESBYOPIA; VISION TESTS;

EID: 0742272736     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Rom WN, ed. Environmental and occupational medicine, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998:3.
2. Sauter SI, Gottlieb MS, Jones KC, et al. Job and health implications of VDT use; initial results of the Wisconsin-NIOSH study. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery 1982;26:284-94.
3. Salibello C. Comparing a printed image and a Gaussian image diagnostic system. J Behav Optom 1994;5:59-61,67.
4. Charman W, Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation on the spatial frequency spectrum of gratings. Vis Res 1977; 17:129-39.
5. Dainoff MJ. Occupational stress factors in video display terminal (VDT) operation: a review of empirical research. Behav Inform Technol 1982;1:141-76.
6. Birnbaum MH. Optometric management of nearpoint vision disorders. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:53-71.
7. PRIO® Corporation Product Practice Guide, 4000 Kruse Way Place, Building 2, Suite 120, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035.
8. Rouse MW, London R, Allen DC. An evaluation of the monocular estimation method of dynamic retinoscopy. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:234-9.
9. Kolker D, Hutchinson R, Nilsen E. Comparison of tests of accommodation for computer users. Optometry 2002; 73:212-20.
10. Health and Safety Guidelines for Video Display Terminals in the Workplace. Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (OR-OSHA). http://www.cbs.state.or.us/external/ osha/pdf/pubs/1863.pdf
11. Sheedy JE. Visual display terminals - solving the environmental problems. In: Sheedy JE, ed. Problems in optometry - environmental optics. (Vol. 2). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990:17-31.
12. Jackson TW, Goss DA. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. J AM OPTOM ASSOC 1991;62:857-66.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
14. Tucker J, Charman WN. Depth of focus and accommodation for sinusoidal gratings as a function of luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:58-70.