Microbial kinetic analysis of three different types of EBNR process

Chemosphere

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 109-118

  Pai, T Y ^a   Tsai, Y P ^b   Chou, Y J ^c   Chang, H Y ^d   Leu, H G ^e   Ouyang, C F ^f  

^a CHAOYANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c FOOYIN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d MINGHSIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^e Environmental Protection Administration Taiwan   (Taiwan)

^f NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anaerobic anoxic oxide (A2O); ASM2d (Activated Sludge Model No. 2d); Biological nutrient removal (BNR); Kinetic; TNCU2; TNCU3

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; RECYCLING; SEWAGE SLUDGE; SUBSTRATES;

BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL (BNR); MICROBIAL KINETIC ANALYSIS;

DENITRIFICATION;

CARBON; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; BIOREACTOR; DENITRIFICATION;

AEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DENITRIFICATION; DILUTION; ENERGY; FEEDING; FLOW RATE; KINETICS; LIQUID; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL KINETICS; MICROORGANISM; NUTRIENT; NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT; PARTICULATE MATTER; RECYCLING; SEWAGE; SLUDGE; SUPERNATANT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0742272025     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.09.048     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, US.
2. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M.C., Marais G.v.R., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Activated sludge model no. 2d, ASM2d. Water Science and Technology. 39(1):1999;165-182.
3. Kappeler J., Gujer W. Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modeling. Water Science and Technology. 25(6):1992;125-139.
4. Kristensen G.H., Jorgensen P.E., Henze M. Characterization of functional microorganism groups and substrate in activated sludge and wastewater by AUR, NUR and OUR. Water Science and Technology. 25(6):1992;43-57.
5. Mino T., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water Research. 32(11):1998;3193-3207.
6. Orhon D., Artan N. Modelling of Activated Sludge System. 1994;Technomic, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, US.
7. Ouyang C.F., Chou Y.J., Pai T.Y., Chang H.Y., Liu W.T. Optimization of enhanced biological wastewater treatment processes using a step-feed approach. Matsuo T., Hanaki K., Takizawa S., Satoh H. Advances in Water and Wastewater Treatment Technology in 2000 - Molecular technology, nutrient removal, sludge reduction and environmental health. 2001;295-304 Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
8. Pai T.Y., Ouyang C.F., Su J.L., Leu H.K. Modelling the steady-state effluent characteristics of the TNCU process with ASM2d under varied SRT conditions. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering. 10(1):2000;35-42.
9. 2O process with Activated Sludge Model 2d under different return supernatant. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers. 24(1):2001;1-10.
10. Pai T.Y., Ouyang C.F., Su J.L., Leu H.K. Modelling the steady-state effluent characteristics of the TNCU process under different return mixed liquid. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 25(12):2001;1025-1038.
11. van Veldhuizen H.M., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. Modelling biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge process. Water Research. 33(16):1999;3459-3468.
12. WEF, 1999. Biological and Chemical Systems for Nutrient Removal. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria,Virginia, US.