Economic analysis and legal pragmatism

International Review of Law and Economics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 421-437

  Krecké, Elisabeth ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Law and economics movement; Pragmatic conceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742271774     PISSN: 01448188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2003.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Calabresi G. An exchange about law and economics, letter to Dworkin Journal of Legal Studies 9 2 1980 553
2. Cooter R. Torts as the union of liberty and efficiency: An essay on causation Chicago-Kent Law Review 63 3 1987 523
3. Feldman, S. M. (2000). American legal thought from premodernism to postmodernism: An intellectual voyage. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Holmes, O. W. (1881). The common law. Boston: Little, Brown.
6. Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2003). Fairness versus welfare: Notes on the Pareto principle, preferences and distributive justice. NBER Working Papers 9622. National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Kobayashi, B., & Lott, J. (1993). Judicial reputation and the efficiency of the common law. Wharton School Working Paper.
8. Krecke E. The role of entrepreneurship in shaping legal evolution Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 12 2 2002 241
9. Kronman A.T. Mistake disclosure information and the law of contracts Journal of Legal Studies 7 1 1978 1
10. Kronman A.T. Wealth maximization as a normative principle Journal of Legal Studies 9 2 1980 227
11. Kronman, A. T. (1993). The lost lawyer: Failing ideals of the legal profession. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
12. Landes W. & Posner R.A. The positive economic theory of tort law Georgia Law Review 15 1981 851
13. Litowitz, D. E. (1997). Postmodern philosophy and law. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
14. Lubet S. Is legal theory good for anything? University of Illinois Law Review 1 1997 193
15. Lyotard, F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. by G. Bennington & B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Machan T. Posner's Rortyite (pragmatic) jurisprudence American Journal of Jurisprudence 40 1995 1
17. Posner, R. A. (1977). Economic analysis of law. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company (6th ed., 2003).
18. Posner R.A. The ethical and political basis of the efficiency norm in common law adjudication Hofstra Law Review 8 3 1980 487
19. Posner, R. A. (1993). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Posner, R. A. (1999). The problematics of moral and legal theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Posner, R. A. (2002). Law, economics, and democracy. Three lectures in Greece. University of Athens, Athens, Komitisini, Greece: Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers.
23. Posner, R. A. (2003). Law, pragmatism, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Rizzo, M. J. (1979). Uncertainty, subjectivity and the economic analysis of law. In M. J. Rizzo (Ed.), Time, uncertainty and disequilibrium. exploration of Austrian themes. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Co.
25. Rizzo M.J. The mirage of efficiency Hofstra Law Review 8 3 1980 641
26. Rorty R. The banality of pragmatism and the poetry of justice Southern California Law Review 63 1990 1811
27. Rubin P.H. Why is the common law efficient? Journal of Legal Studies 6 1 1977 51
28. Rubin P.H. & Bailey M.J. The role of lawyers in changing the law Emory University Law and Economics Working Papers Series 47 1992 34
29. Ulen T. S. (1999). The present and future state of law and economics. In C. Ott & H. B. Schäfer (Eds.), New developments in law and economics: Erasmus programme in law and economics (Vol. 2). University of Hamburg.