Evaluation of a synthetic bone defect test model to aid in the selection of materials for use in vertebral body compression fracture repair

Orthopedics

Volumn 27, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Carroll, Michael ^a   Lewis, Gladius ^b   Xu, J ^b   Moseley, Jon ^a   Cole, Jantzen ^a   Haggard, Warren ^a  

^a WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYURETHAN FOAM;

ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRENGTH; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOAM STABILITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRABECULAR BONE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERTEBRA BODY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

EID: 0742271682     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-07     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Predey TA, Sewall LE, Smith SJ. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: new treatment for vertebral compression fractures. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 66:611-615.
2. Carroll ME, Cole J, Haggard WO, Moseley JP. Evaluation of an injectable calcium sulfate bone void filler in a semi-contained bone defect test model. 29th Proceedings Society of Biomaterials. 2003:335.
3. Szivek JA, Thomas M, Benjamin JB. Technical note: characterization of a synthetic foam as a model for human cancellous bone. Biomaterials. 1993; 4:269-272.
4. American Society for Testing Materials. Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. F1839-01.
5. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine. 2001; 26:1537-1541.
6. International Organization for Standardization. Implants for surgery-Acrylic resin cements. 5833.
7. Liebschner MA, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine. 2001; 26:1547-1554.
8. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, Scribner RM, Reiley ME, Talmadge K. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine. 2001; 26:151-156.
9. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. Appl Biomater 1997; 38:155-182.
10. Postak PD, Ratzel AR, Greenwald SD. Assuring cement fixation: all mixing systems are not the same. AAOS Scientific Exhibit, #SE214. New Orleans, La; 2003.
11. Lim TH, Brebach GT, Renner SM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty. Spine. 2002; 27:1297-1302.
12. Turner TM. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of vertebroplasty using injectable calcium phosphate cement compared to polymethylmethacrylate in a unique canine vertebral body large defect model. 29th Proceedings of the Society of Biomaterials. 2003:297.
13. Chow LC, Hirayama S, Takagi S, Parry E. Diametral tensile strength and compressive strength phosphate cement: effect of applied pressure. Appl Biomater 2000; 53:511-517.