Dynamic Hubbard model: Effect of finite boson frequency

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 22, 2003, Pages

  Marsiglio, F ^a   Teshima, R ^a   Hirsch, J E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; BOSON; CONDUCTOR; ELECTRON; ENERGY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL; SUPERCONDUCTOR;

EID: 0742270363     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.224507     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206402 (2001).
2. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 65, 184502 (2002).
3. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 65, 214510 (2002);
4. Phys. Rev. B J.E. Hirsch 66, 064507 (2002).
5. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 67, 035103 (2003).
6. J.E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11 515 (1989);
7. Phys. Rev. B J.E. Hirsch F. Marsiglio 41, 6435 (1990).
8. H. Ding, J.R. Engelbrecht, Z. Wang, J.C. Campuzano, S.C. Wang, H.B. Yang, R. Rogan, T. Takahashi, K. Kadowaki, and D.G. Hinks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 227001 (2001);
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. Y. Ando, A.N. Lavrov, S. Komiya, K. Segawa, and X.F. Sun, 87, 017001 (2001);
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. P.D. Johnson, T. Valla, A.V. Fedorov, Z. Yusof, B.O. Wells, Q. Li, A.R. Moodenbaugh, G.D. Gu, N. Koshizuka, C. Kendziora, Sha Jian, and D.G. Hinks, 87, 177007 (2001).
11. I.G. Lang and Y.A. Firsov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 43, 923 (1962)
12. [Sov. Phys. JETP 16, 1301 (1963)].
13. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14 487 (2000);
14. Phys. Rev. B J.E. Hirsch 62, 14 498 (2000).
15. F. Marsiglio and J. P. Carbotte, in The Physics of Conventional and Unconventional Superconductors, edited by K.H. Bennemann and J.B. Ketterson (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003), p. 233; cond-mat/0106143.
16. n) is replaced by a constant independent of Matsubara frequency. These corrections have been neglected, and are expected to cause only minor quantitative changes.
17. c [because of the minus sign in front of the κ(n) term]. That this is not the case is clear from the numerical solutions (see Fig. 11).
18. F. Marsiglio and J.E. Hirsch, Physica C 165, 71 (1990).