On the use of empirical research for the development of a theory of pedagogy

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 211-221

  Gore, Jennifer M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742268324     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764970270205     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arac, J., ed. 1988. After Foucault: humanistic knowledge, postmodern challenges, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
2. Bernstein, B., 1990. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse, London: Routledge.
3. Bernstein, B., 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: theory, research and critique, London: Taylor & Francis.
4. Bourdieu, P., 1991. “ Meanwhile, I have come to know all the diseases of sociological understanding ”. In The Craft of Sociology: epistemological preliminaries, Edited by: Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. C., and Passeron, J. C., 247–259. Berlin: De Gruyter.
5. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.C., and Passeron, J.C., 1991. The Craft of Sociology: epistemological preliminaries, Berlin: De Gruyter.
6. Culley, M., 1985. “ Anger and authority in the introductory women's studies classroom ”. In Gendered Subjects: the dynamics of feminist teaching, Edited by: Culley, M., and Portuges, C., 209–18. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7. Dewey, J., 1968. The School and Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Ellsworth, E., 1989. Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59: 297–324.
9. Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison, New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
10. Foucault, M. 1980. “ Prison talk ”. In Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977, Edited by: Gordon, C., 37–54. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
11. Foucault, M., 1983a. “ Afterword: the subject and power ”. In Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Edited by: Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P., 208–226. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Foucault, M., 1983b. “ On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of a work in progress ”. In Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Edited by: Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P., 229–252. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Foucault, M., 1988. “ The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom ”. In The Final Foucault, Edited by: Bernauer, J., and Rasmussen, D., 1–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Fraser, N., 1989. Unruly Practices: power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Freire, P., 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York, NY: Seabury Press.
16. Fullan, M., 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17. Gilbert, P., 1996. Talking About Gender: terminology used in the education of girls policy area and implications for policy priorities and programs, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
18. Giroux, H.A., 1983. Theory and Resistance in Education, South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
19. Goodlad, J.I., 1994. Educational Renewal: better teachers, better schools, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Gore, J.M., 1993. The Struggle for Pedagogies: critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth, New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Gore, J.M., 1995a. On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5: 165–188.
22. Gore, J.M., 1995b. “ Foucault's poststructuralism and observational education research: a study of power relations ”. In After Postmodernism: education, politics and identity, Edited by: Smith, R., and Wexler, P., 98–111. London: Falmer.
23. Gore, J.M., Understanding power relations in pedagogy. paper presented at The Joint Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and Educational Research Association. Singapore.
24. Gore, J.M., 1997. “ On the limits to empowerment through critical and feminist pedagogies ”. In Critical Educational Theory in Unsettling Times, Edited by: Carlson, D., and Apple, M., Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Grumet, M.R., 1988. Bitter Milk, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
26. Gutting, G., ed. 1994. The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hunter, I., 1988. Culture and Government: the emergence of literary education, London: Macmillan Press.
28. Ladwig, J.G., 1996. Academic Distinctions: theory and methodology in the sociology of school knowledge, New York, NY: Routledge.
29. Maher, F.A., 1987. Inquiry teaching and feminist pedagogy. Social Education, 51: 186–192.
30. Martin, J.R., 1981. Reclaiming a Conversation: the ideal of the educated woman, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. McWilliam, E., and Taylor, P.G., eds. 1996. Pedagogy, Technology and the Body, New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32. Orner, M., 1992. “ Interrupting calls for student voice in ‘liberatory’ education: a feminist poststructuralist perspective ”. In Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy, Edited by: Luke, C., and Gore, J., 74–89. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Sennett, R., 1996. Flesh and Stone: the body and the city in western civilisation, New York, NY: Norton.
34. Shor, I., 1980. Critical Teaching and Everyday Life, Boston, MA: South End Press.
35. Shor, I., and Freire, P., 1987. A Pedagogy for Liberation: dialogues on transforming education, South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
36. Spelman, E.V., 1988. Inessential Woman: problems of exclusion in feminist thought, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
37. Teese, R.V., 1995. Who Wins at School?: boys and girls in Australian secondary education, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
38. Wittgenstein, L., 1958. Philosophical Investigations, New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.