Progress in automated evaluation of curved surface range image segmentation

Proceedings-International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 644-647

  Min, Jaesik ^a   Powell, Mark W ^a   Bowyer, Kevin W ^a  

^a University of South Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SCANNING;

AUTOMATED EVALUATION; CURVED SURFACES; IMAGE DATASETS; PARAMETER-TUNING; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; RANGE IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RANGE SCANNERS; TOROIDAL SURFACE;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 0742266267     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2000.905420     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. P. Besl and R. Jain. Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting. IEEE PAMI, 10(2):167-192, March 1988.
2. A. Hoover, G. Jean-Baptiste, and et al. An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE PAMI, 18(7):673-689, July 1996.
3. X. Jiang, K. Bowyer, and et al. Some further results of experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, page (this proceedings), Barcelona, 2000.
4. X. Jiang and H. Bunke. Range image segmentation: Adaptive grouping of edges into regions. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Hong Kong, 1998.
5. M. W. Powell, K. W. Bowyer, X. Jiang, and H. Bunke. Comparing curved-surface range image segmenters. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Mumbai, India, January 1998.