Finite element prediction of endosteal and periosteal bone remodelling in the turkey ulna: Effect of remodelling signal and dead-zone definition

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 217, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 349-356

  Taylor, W R ^a   Warner, M D ^a   Clift, S E ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Finite element analysis; Remodelling signal; Turkey ulna

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; ITERATIVE METHODS; PROSTHETICS; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; ABAQUS; BONE; FORECASTING;

ENDOSTEAL BONE REMODELING; PERIOSTEAL BONE REMODELING; TURKEY ULNA;

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE REMODELING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STIMULATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; TURKEY (BIRD); ULNA; VALIDATION STUDY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TURKEYS; ULNA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

BONE REMODELLING; FINITE-ELEMENT PREDICTIONS; LOADING CONDITION; LOCALIZED SENSITIVITIES; MECHANICAL SIGNALS; PRINCIPAL STRESS; TENSILE PRINCIPAL STRAINS; TURKEY ULNA;

EID: 0642375752     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/095441103770802513     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hart, R. T., Davy, D. T. and Heiple, K. G. Mathematical modelling and numerical solutions for functionally dependent bone remodelling. Calcified Tissue Int., 1984, 36, S104-S109.
2. Meade, J. B., Cowin, S. C., Klawitter, J. J., Van Buskirk, W. C. and Skinner, H. B. Bone remodelling due to continuously applied loads. Calcified Tissue Int., 1984, 36, S25-S30.
3. Rubin, C. T., McLeod, K. J. and Bain, S. D. Functional strains and cortical bone adaptation: epigenetic assurance of skeletal integrity. J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 43-54.
4. Cowin, S. C., Moss-Salentijn, L. and Moss, M. L. Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. J. Biomech. Engng, 1991, 113, 191-197.
5. Cowin, S. C. Bone stress adaptation models. J. Biomech. Engng, 1993, 115, 528-533.
6. Harrigan, T. P. and Hamilton, J. J. Bone remodelling and structural optimization. J. Biomechanics, 1994, 27, 323-328.
7. Rubin, C. T. and McLeod, K. J. Endogenous control of bone morphology via frequency specific, low magnitude functional strain. In Bone Structure and Remodelling (Eds A. Odgaards and H. Weinans), 1995, pp. 79-89 (World Scientific, London).
8. Carlsson, A. S. and Gentz, C.-F. Mechanical loosening of the femoral prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1980, 147, 262-270.
9. Cohen, B. and Rushton, N. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1995, 77-B(5), 815-819.
10. Orr, T. E., Beaupré, G. S., Carter, D. R. and Schurman, D. J. Computer predictions of bone remodelling around porous-coated implants, J. Arthroplasty, 1990, 5, 191-200.
11. Smolinski, P. and Rubash, H. E. Bone remodelling around total hip implants, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Engng, 1992, 20, 461-483.
12. van Rietbergen, B., Huiskes, R., Weinans, H., Sumner, D. R., Turner, T. M. and Galante, J. O. The mechanism of bone remodelling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26 (4/5), 369-382.
13. Skinner, H. B., Kilgus, D. J., Keyak, J. H., Shimaoka, E. E., Kim, A. S. and Tipton, J. S. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodelling around cementless femoral implants. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 1994, 305, 178-189.
14. Huiskes, R. Bone remodelling around implants can be explained as an effect of mechanical adaptation. In Total Hip Revision Surgery (Eds J. O. Galante, A. G. Rosenberg and J. J. Callaghan), 1995, pp. 159-171 (Raven Press, New York).
15. Weinans, H. and Sumner, D. R. Finite element analyses to study periprosthetic bone adaptation. In Bone Research in Biomechanics (Eds G. Lowet, P. Ruegsegger, H. Weinans and A. Meunier), 1997, pp. 3-16 (IOS Press, Amsterdam).
16. Brown, T. D., Pedersen, D. R., Gray, M. L., Brand, R. A. and Rubin, C. T. Toward an identification of mechanical parameters initiating periosteal remodelling: a combined experimental and analytic approach. J Biomechanics, 1990, 23(9), 893-905.
17. O'Connor, J. J., Lanyon, L. E. and McFie, H. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. J. Biomechanics, 1982, 15(10), 767-781.
18. Luo, G., Cowin, S. C., Sadegh, A. M. and Arramon, Y. P. Implementation of strain rate as a bone remodelling stimulus. J. Biomech. Engng, 1995, 117, 329-338.
19. Adams, D. J., Spirt, A. A., Brown, T. D., Fritton, S. P., Rubin, C. T. and Brand, R. A. Testing the daily stress stimulus theory of bone adaptation with natural and experimentally controlled strain histories. J. Biomechanics, 1997, 30, 671-678.
20. Terrier, A., Rakotomanana, R. L., Ramaniraka, A. N. and Leyvraz, P. F. Adaptation models of anisotropic bone. Computer Meth. Biology Biomed. Engng, 1997, 1, 47-59.
21. Stülpner, M. A., Reddy, B. D., Starke, G. R. and Spirakis, A. A three dimensional finite analysis of adaptive remodelling in the proximal femur. J. Biomechanics, 1997, 30, 1063-1066.
22. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., van Rietbergen, B., Sumner, D.R., Turner, T. M. and Galante, J. O. Adaptive bone remodelling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation. J. Orthop. Res., 1993, 11, 500-513.
23. Kerner, J., Huiskes, R., van Lenthe, G. H., Weins, H., van Rietbergen, B., Engh, C. A. and Amis, A. A. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J. Biomechanics, 1999, 32, 695-703.
24. Rubin, C. T. and Lanyon, L. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcified Tissue Int., 1985, 37, 411-417.
25. Taylor, W. R. and Clift, S. E. Swelling as an approach to the simulation of cortical bone remodelling. In Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering - 2 (Eds. J. Middleton, M. L. Jones and G. N. Pande), 1998, pp. 263-269 (Gordon and Breach, New York).
26. Carter, D. R. The relationship between in-vivo strains and cortical bone remodeling. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Engng, 1982, 8(1), 1-28.
27. Frost, H. M. Bone mass and the 'mechanostat': a proposal. Anat. Rec., 1987, 219(1), 1-9.