Identifying racial privilege: Lessons from critical race theory and the law

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 24-25

  Seiler, Naomi ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; CAUCASIAN; CIVIL RIGHTS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ETHICIST; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; MINORITY GROUP; NOTE; RACE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;

BIOETHICS; CIVIL RIGHTS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; ETHICISTS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; MINORITY GROUPS; PREJUDICE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 0642375299     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603766436153     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Baker, R. 2003. Balkanizing bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(2):13–14.
2. Bell, D. A. Jr. 1973. Race, racism, and American law, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Crenshaw, K., N. Gotanda, G. Peller, and K. Thomas eds. 1995. Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: The New Press.
4. Crenshaw, K. 2002. Critical race studies: The. rst decade: Critical reections, or “A foot in the closing door. UCLA Law Review 49:1343.
5. Flagg, B. 1993. “Was blind, but now I see”: White race consciousness and the requirement of discriminatory intent. Michigan Law Review 91:953.
6. Gotanda, N. 1991. A critique of “Our Constitution Is Color-Blind.” Stanford Law Review 44:1.
7. Harris, C. 1993. Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review 106:1707.
8. Myser, C. 2003. Differences from somewhere: The normativity of whiteness in bioethics in the United States. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(2):1–11.