Standards for family decisions: Replacing best interests with harmprevention

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 54-55

  Dresser, Rebecca ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CIRCUMCISION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; NEWBORN; NOTE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PARENTAL CONSENT; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 0642375295     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603766436252     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Benatar, M., and D. Benatar. 2003. Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(2):35–48.
2. Dresser, R. 1994. Missing persons: Legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers Law Review 46(2):609–719.
3. Dresser, R., and P. J. Whitehouse. 1994. The incompetent patient on the slippery slope. Hastings Center Report 24(4):6–12.
4. Shapiro, M. H., R. G. Spece, R. Dresser, and E. W. Clayton. 2003. Bioethics and law: Cases, materials and problems, 2nd ed. St. Paul: West Group.