Dayside isotropic precipitation of energetic protons

Annales Geophysicae

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1233-1245

  Sergeev, V A ^a   Bikkuzina, G R ^a   Newell, P T ^b  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0642374247     PISSN: 09927689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-997-1233-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alem, F. and D. Delcourt, Nonadiabatic precipitation of ions at the cusp equatorward edge, J. Geophys. Res, 100, 19321-19328, 1995.
2. Z and AE(12) using nearly one year's data, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 10047-10054, 1986.
3. Crooker, N. U., and G. L. Siscoe, Birkeland currents as the cause of the low-latitude asymmetric disturbance field, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11201-11210, 1981.
4. Crooker, N. U., J. Berchem, and C. T. Russell, Cusp displacement at the magnetopause for large IMF y-component, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 13467-13471, 1987.
5. Delcourt, D. C., J. A. Sauvaud, R. F. Martin, and T. E. Moore, On the nonadiabatic precipitation of ions from the near-Earth plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 17409-17418, 1996.
6. Hauge, R., and F. Soraas, Precipitation of > 115 keV protons in the evening and forenoon sectors in relation to the magnetic activity, Planet. Space Sci., 23, 1141-1154, 1975.
7. Hill, V. J., D. S. Evans, and H. H. Sauer, TIROS/NOAA satellites space environment monitor. Archive tape documentation. NOAA technical memorandum ERL SEL-71. Boulder, Colorado. 1985.
8. Kaufmann, R. L., D. J. Larson, P. Beidl, and C. Lu, Mapping and energization in the magnetotail, 1. Magnetospheric boundaries, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 9307-9320, 1993.
9. Lundblad, J. A., F. Soraas, and K. Aarsnes, Substorm morphology of > 100 keV protons, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 841-865, 1979.
10. Lyons, L. R., M. Schulz, D. C. Pridmore-Brown, and J. L. Roeder, Low-latitude boundary layer near noon: an open field line model, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 17,367-17,377, 1994.
11. Newell, P. T., and C. I. Meng, Dipole tilt angle effects on the latitude of the cusp and cleft/LLBL, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 6949-6953, 1989.
12. Newell, P. T., C. I. Meng, D. G. Sibeck, and R. P. Lepping, Some low-altitude cusp dependencies on the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 8921-8927, 1989.
13. Roeder, J. L., and L. R. Lyons, Energetic and magnetosheath energy particle signatures of the LLBL at low altitude near noon, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 13,817-13,828, 1992.
14. Sergeev V. A., and B. B. Gvozdevsky, MT-index - a possible new index to characterize the magnetic configuration of magnetotail, Ann. Geophysicae, 13, 1093-1103, 1995.
15. Sergeev, V. A., M. V. Malkov, and K. Mursula, Testing of the isotropic boundary algorithm method to evaluate the magnetic field configuration in the tail, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 7609-7620, 1993.
16. Tsyganenko, N. A., Global quantitive models of the geomagnetic field in the cislunar magnetospheric for different disturbance levels., Planet. Space Sci., 35, 1347-1358, 1987.
17. Tsyganenko, N. A. A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 37, 1, 5-20, 1989.
18. Tsyganenko, N. A. Modelling the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 5599-5612, 1996.