Face recognition with perspective transformation

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 23, 2003, Pages 2393-2402

  Liu, Chang Hong ^a,b   Chaudhuri, Avi ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Configural and featural processing; Face recognition in pictures; Image similarity; Normalization processes; Perspective transformation

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENT; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; FACE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CUES; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0642373660     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00429-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;433-436.
2. Bruce V. Stability from variation: the case of face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology. 47:1994;5-28.
3. Hancock P.J.B., Bruce V., Burton A.M. Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;330-337.
4. Kennedy J.M., Juricevic I. Foreshortening gives way to forelengthening. Perception. 31:2002;893.
5. Kubovy M. The psychology of perspective and renaissance art. 1986;Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
6. Liu C.H., Chaudhuri A. Are there qualitative differences in face recognition between positive and negative? Perception. 27:1998;1107-1122.
7. Liu C.H., Chaudhuri A. Recognition of unfamiliar faces based on three types of effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;445-446.
8. Liu C.H., Collin C.A., Rainville S.J.M., Chaudhuri A. The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26:2000;956-979.
9. Liu Z., Lu H. Amodal completion in a matching task of face recognition. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;57a.
10. Nicholls A.L., Kennedy J.M. Angular subtense effects on perception of polar and parallel projections of cubes. Perception & Psychophysics. 54:1993;763-772.
11. Olmer P. Perspective artistique, vol. 1: principes et mêthodes. 1943;Plon, Paris.
12. O'Toole A.J., Edelman S., Bülthoff H.H. Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vision Research. 38:1998;2351-2363.
13. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;437-442.
14. Pirenne M.H. Optics, painting and photography. 1970;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Sedgwick H.A. The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures. Ellis S.R., Kaiser M.K., Grunwald A.C. Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. 1991;460-479 Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
16. Troje N.F., Bülthoff H.H. Face recognition under varying poses: the role of texture and shape. Vision Research. 36:1996;1761-1771.
17. Yang T., Kubovy M. Weakening the robustness of perspective: evidence for a modified theory of compensation in picture perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 61:1999;456-467.
18. Young A.W., Hay D.C., McWeeny K.H., Flude B.M., Ellis A.W. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception. 14:1985;737-746.