|
Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 823-824
|
Missing evidence for the adequacy of a 1-cm distal margin in resected rectal cancer [3]
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CALCULATION;
CANCER LOCALIZATION;
CANCER PATIENT;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
CANCER SURGERY;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
CANCER THERAPY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
ENDOSCOPY;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
LETTER;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
MEDICAL RECORD;
OUTCOMES RESEARCH;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
PHYSICIAN;
PREOPERATIVE CARE;
RECTUM CANCER;
RECTUM SURGERY;
RECTUM TUMOR;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
STANDARD;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TELEPHONE;
ABDOMINAL SURGERY;
CANCER STAGING;
MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TUMOR RECURRENCE;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
CAMPTOTHECIN;
DRUG DERIVATIVE;
IRINOTECAN;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, PHYTOGENIC;
CAMPTOTHECIN;
COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY;
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
HUMANS;
NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
RECTAL NEOPLASMS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0642372559
PISSN: 10689265
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2003.05.924 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (2)
|