The theoretical and practical importance of the dead donor rule

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-

  McCartney, James J ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEATH; DEATH; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; DONOR; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; NOTE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POLICY; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRANSPLANTATION;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

BRAIN DEATH; DEATH; HUMANS; PUBLIC POLICY; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 0642369502     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603321611827     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bernat, J. 1998. A defense of the whole-brain concept of death. Hastings Center Report 28(2):14–23.
2. Furton, E. 2002. Brain death, the soul, and organic life. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2(3):455–70.
3. Koppelman, E. R. 2003. The dead donor rule and the concept of death: Severing the ties that bind them. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(1):1–9.
4. McCartney, J. 2002. Embryonic stem cell research and respect for human life: Philosophical and legal re ections. Albany Law Review 65(3):597–624.
5. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont report: Ethical principle and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: GPO.