Two-year evaluation of telepathology

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 194-199

  Hutarew, Georg ^a,b   Dandachi, Nadia ^a   Strasser, Felix ^a   Prokop, Eva ^a   Dietze, Otto ^a  

^a St Johanns Spital   (Austria)

^b NONE   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOLOGY; LABORATORY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGIST; REVIEW; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ROBOTICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TELEPATHOLOGY; TIME; VIDEORECORDING;

DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; TELEPATHOLOGY; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0642342966     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/135763303322225508     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Chorneyko K, Giesler R, Sabatino D, et al. Telepathology for routine light microscopic and frozen section diagnosis American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;117:783-90
2. Leong FJ, McGee JO. Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists. Journal of Pathology 2001;195:508-14
3. Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, et al. Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. Human Pathology 2001;32:1283-99
4. Cross SS, Dennis T, Start RD. Telepathology: current status and future prospects in diagnostic histopathology. Histopathology 2002;41:91-109
5. Allen EA, Ollayos CW, Tellado MV, et al. Characteristics of a telecytology consultation service. Human Pathology 2001;32:1323-6
6. Leong FJ, Nicholson AG, McGee JO Robotic telepathology: efficacy and usability in pulmonary pathology. Journal of Pathology 2002;197:211-17
7. Battmann A, Schulz A, Knoblauch B. [Telepathology - applications of an emerging technology.] Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Patholologie 2001;85:100-8
8. Dietel M, Hufnagl P. [Electronic communication in medicine.] Zeitung fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung 2001;95:596-600
9. Singh N, Akbar N, Sowter C, Lea KG, Wells CA. Telepathology in a routine clinical environment: implementation and accuracy of diagnosis by robotic microscopy in a one-stop breast clinic. Journal of Pathology 2002;196:351-5
10. Montironi R, Thompson D, Scarpelli M, et al. Transcontinental communication and quantitative digital histopathology via the Internet, with special reference to prostate neoplasia. Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:452-60
11. Kayser K. Telepathology in Europe. Analytical Cellular Pathology 2000;21:95-6
12. Kayser K, Beyer M, Blum S, Kayser G. Telecommunication: a new tool for quality assurance and control in diagnostic pathology. Folia Neuropathologica 2000;38:79-83
13. Williams BH, Mullick FG, Butler DR, et al. Clinical evaluation of an international static image-based telepathology service. Human Pathology 2001;32:1309-17
14. Brauchli K, Helfrich M, Christen H, et al. [The future of telepathology. An Internet 'distributed system' with 'open standards'.] Pathologe 2002;23 198-206
15. Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Meijer GA. Experience with a dynamic inexpensive video-conferencing system for frozen section telepathology. Analytical Cellular Pathology 2000;21:169-75
16. Battmann A, Knitza R, Janzen S, et al. Telemedicine application of telepathology remote microscopy for intraoperative diagnoses of frozen sections. Studies in Health and Technology Information 2000;77:1127-30
17. Della Mea V, Cataldi P, Boi S, Finato N, Dalla Palma P, Beltrami CA. Image sampling in static telepathology for frozen section diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1999;52:761-5
18. Hufnagl P, Bayer G, Oberbamscheidt P, et al. Comparison of different telepathology solutions for primary frozen section diagnosis. Analytical Cellular Pathology 2000;21:161-7
19. Winokur TS, McClellan S, Siegal GP, et al. A prospective trial of telepathology for intraoperative consultation (frozen sections). Human Pathology 2000;31:781-5
20. Gardziella S, Hufnagl P, Bodo M, Mortara I, Dietel M [The UICC Telepathology Consultation Center. 'Second opinion' over the Internet for pathologists.] Pathologe 2001;22:288-9
21. Dietel M, Nguyen-Dobinsky TN, Hufnagl P. The UICC Telepathology Consultation Center. International Union Against Cancer. A global approach to improving consultation for pathologists in cancer diagnosis. Cancer 2000;89:187-91
22. Gombas P, Skepper JN, Hegyi L. The image pyramid system: an unbiased, inexpensive and broadly accessible method of telepathology. Pathology Oncology Research 2002;8:68-73
23. Brauchli K, Christen H, Haroske G, Meyer W, Kunze KD, Oberholzer M. Telemicroscopy by the Internet revisited. Journal of Pathology 2002;196:238-43
24. Eikelboom RH, Yogesan K, Barry CJ, et al. Methods and limits of digital image compression of retinal images for telemedicine. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000;41:1916-24
25. Foran DJ, Meer PP, Papathomas T, Marsic I. Compression guidelines for diagnostic telepathology. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 1997;1:55-60
26. Plinkert PK, Plinkert B, Kurek R, et al. [Audiovisual telecommunication by multimedia technology in HNO medicine. ISDN - internet - ATM.] HNO 2000;48:809-15
27. Wilkinson DS. The role of technology in the clinical laboratory of the future. Clinical Laboratory Management Review 1997;11:322-30
28. Dunn BE, Choi H, Almagro UA, Recla DL. Combined robotic and nonrobotic telepathology as an integral service component of a geographically dispersed laboratory network Human Pathology 2001;32:1300-3