Extending the shine-through effect to classical masking paradigms

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 25, 2003, Pages 2659-2667

  Herzog, Michael H ^a   Harms, Margret ^a   Ernst, Udo A ^a   Eurich, Christian W ^a   Mahmud, Shamsul H ^a,b   Fahle, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DHAKA   (Bangladesh)

Author keywords

Metacontrast; Shine through effect; Spatial vision; Verniers; Visual masking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION; AFTERIMAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ILLUSION;

AFTERIMAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0642341064     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00461-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bach M. The "Freiburg Visual Acuity Test". Automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science. 73:1996;49-53.
2. Bachmann T. Psychophysiology of visual masking. 1994;Nova Science Publishers, Inc, Commack, New York.
3. Banks W.P., White H. Lateral interference and perceptual grouping in visual detection. Perception and Psychophysics. 36:1984;285-295.
4. Breitmeyer B.G. Disinhibition in metacontrast masking of vernier acuity targets: sustained channels inhibit transient channels. Vision Research. 18:1978;1401-1405.
5. Breitmeyer B.G. Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford psychology, series no. 4. 1984;Clarendon Press.
6. Breitmeyer B.G., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review. 83(1):1976;1-36.
7. Breitmeyer B.G., Oegmen H. Recent models and findings in backward visual masking: a comparison, review, and update. Perception and Psychophysics. 62(8):2000;1572-1595.
8. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 129(4):2000;481-507.
9. Enns J.T. Visual binding in the standing wave illusion. Psychological Bulletin. 2002.
10. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Science. 4(9):2000;345-352.
11. Eriksen C.W. Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(1):1966;26-35.
12. Francis G. Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. Psychologcial Review. 107:2000;1-18.
13. Francis, G., & Herzog, M. H. (in press). Testing quantitative models of backward masking. Psychologcial Bulletin.
14. Herzog, M. H., Ernst, U., Etzold, A., & Eurich, C. (in press). Local interactions in neural networks explain global effects in the masking of visual stimuli. Neural Computation.
15. Herzog M.H., Fahle M. Effects of grouping in contextual modulation. Nature. 415:2002;433-436.
16. Herzog M.H., Fahle M., Koch C. Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through. Vision Research. 41:2001;2325-2335.
17. Herzog, M. H., & Koch, C. (1999). How a conscious percept can inherit a property of an invisible prime. In Proceedings of the third annual conference of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness (ASSC).
18. Herzog M.H., Koch C. Seeing properties of an invisible element: feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 98:2001;4271-4275.
19. Herzog M.H., Koch C., Fahle M. Switching binding states. Visual Cognition. 8:2001;623-636.
20. Herzog M.H., Koch C., Fahle M. Shine-through: temporal aspects. Vision Research. 41:2001;2337-2346.
21. Herzog, M. H., Kopmann, S., & Brand, A. (submitted). Intact figure-ground-segmentation in schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Research.
22. Li W., Thier P., Wehrhahn C. Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 83:2000;941-954.
23. Kolers P.A. Intensity and contour effects in visual masking. Vision Research. 2:1962;277-294.
24. MacKay D.M. Lateral interaction between neural channels sensitive to texture density. Nature. 245:1973;159-161.
25. Macknik S.L., Martinez-Conde S., Haglund M.M. The role of spatio temporal edges in visibility and visual masking. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. 97:2000;7556-7560.
26. McCarter A., Roehrs T. A spatial frequency analogue to Mach bands. Vision Research. 16:1976;1317-1321.
27. Sagi D., Hochstein S. Lateral inhibition between spatially adjacent spatial-frequency channels? Perception & Psychophysics. 37:1985;315-322.
28. Schuboe A., Schlaghecken F., Meinecke C. Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 27(4):2001;216-228.
29. Taylor M.M., Creelman C.D. PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 41:1967;782-787.
30. Turvey M.T. On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review. 80:1973;1-52.
31. Wehrhahn C., Li W., Westheimer G. Patterns that impair discrimination of orientation in human vision. Perception. 25:1996;1053-1064.
32. Werner H. Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses. American Journal of Psychology. 47:1935;40-64.
33. Westheimer G. Spatial interactions in human cone vision. Journal of Physiology. 190:1967;139-154.