Resistance of medical gloves to permeation by methyl methacrylate (MMA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), and 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate (1,4-BDMA)

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 289-299

  Lönnroth, Emma Christin ^a,b   Ruyter, I Eystein ^a  

^a Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

^b LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Bone cement; Breakthrough time; Degradation; Permeation rate; Prosthetic materials

Indexed keywords

1,4 BUTANEDIOL DIMETHACRYLATE; 1,4-BUTANEDIOL DIMETHACRYLATE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PERMEABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STANDARD; SURGICAL GLOVE;

GLOVES, SURGICAL; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PERMEABILITY;

EID: 0642334590     PISSN: 10803548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2003.11076569     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (1994). Protective gloves against chemicals and microorganisms—Part 3: Determination of resistance to permeation by chemicals (Standard No. EN 374-3:1994). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
2. Gebhardt, M., & Geier, J. (1996). Evaluation of patch test results with denture material series. Contact Dermatitis, 34, 191-195.
3. Geukens, S., & Goossens, A. (2001). Occupational contact allergy to (me th) acrylates. Contact Dermatitis, 44, 153-159.
4. Kanerva, L., Alanko, K., Estlander, T., Jolanki, R., Lathinen, A., & Savela, A. (2000). Statistics on occupational contact dermatitis from (meth)acrylates in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis, 42, 175-176.
5. Kanerva, L., Estlander, T., & Jolanki, R. (1997). Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic tri-cure glass ionomers. Contact Dermatitis, 37, 49-50.
6. Kanerva, L., Estlander, T., Jolanki, R., & Hendricks-Eckerman, M.-L. (1995). Allergy caused by acrylate compounds at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) 1975-1995. In Proceedings of Sixth FIOH-NIOSH Joint Symposium on Occupational Health and Safety (pp. 128-134; People and Work; Research Reports, 3). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
7. Kanerva, L., Jolanki, R., Leino, T., & Estlander, T. (1995). Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified structural adhesive. Contact Dermatitis, 33, 84-89.
8. Kanerva, L., Lauerma, A., Estlander, T., & Alanko, K. (1996). Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth)acrylates in nail cosmetics. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 7, 109-115.
9. Klein, R.C., Party, E., & Gershey, E.L. (1990). Virus penetration of examination gloves. Biotechniques, 9(2), 196-199.
10. Lonnroth, E.-C., Wellendorf, H., & Ruyter, I.E. (in press). Permeability of different type of dental protective gloves to methyl methacrylate (MMA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) and 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate (1,4-BDMA). European Journal of Oral Sciences.
11. Rickards, J.M., Sydiskis, R.J., Davidson, W.M., Josell, S.D., & Lavine, D.S. (1993). Permeability of latex gloves after contact with dental materials. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 104, 224-229.
12. Rustemeyer, T., & Frosch, P.J. (1996). Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians (1). Clinical picture and essential factors. Contact Dermatitis, 34, 125-133.
13. Ruyter, I.E., & Øysæd, H. (1988). Analysis and characterisation of dental polymers. CRC Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility, 4, 247-279.
14. Wrangsö, K., Swartling, C., & Meding, B. (2001). Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: Contact dermatitis with special references to (meth) acrylates in 174 patients. Contact Dermatitis, 45, 158-163.