Effect of surface conditioning techniques on the resistance of resin composite core materials on titanium posts

Quintessence International

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 766-771

  Akişli, Ismail ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b,c   Nergiz, Ibrahim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Post and core materials; Surface conditioning techniques; Titanium posts

Indexed keywords

RESIN; TITANIUM; ACRYLONITRILE; BIOMATERIAL; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CORADENT; DENTACOLOR; DRUG DERIVATIVE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; KEVLOC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; ROCATEC; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE CEMENT; SILOC; TI CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TI-CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COATED PARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; EVALUATION; FORCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MOLECULAR STABILITY; RANK SUM TEST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TORQUE;

ACRYLONITRILE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SILICATE CEMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 0642334554     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Burgess JO, Summit JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
2. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retentive properties of threaded split-shaft posts with titanium-reinforced composite cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:910-912.
3. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:178-182.
4. Olivia RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composite used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:554-561.
5. Hemmings KW, King PA, Setchell DJ. Resistance to torsional forces of various post and core designs. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:325-329.
6. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing functions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-590.
7. Chang WC, Millstein PL. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads and core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:475-482.
8. Huysmans MCDNJM, Van der Varst PGT. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:252-257.
9. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(7):595-601.
10. Huysmans MCDNJM, Van der Varst PGT, Schäfer R, Peters MCRB, Plasschaert AMJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behaviour of direct post-and-core restored premolars. J Dent Res 1992;71:1145-1150.
11. Chapman KW, Worley JL, Von Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:649-652.
12. Plasmans PJJM, Visseren LGH, Vrijhoef MMA, Kayser AF. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1986;12:382-387.
13. Nayar A. Coronal-radicular buildup for endodontically treated teeth. In: Clark JW (ed). Clinical Dentistry, vol 4. Philadelphia: Harper & Row, 1983:1-28.
14. Chan KC, Fuller J, Khowassah M. The adaptation of new amalgam and composite resin to pins. J Prosthet Dent 1978;38:392-395.
15. Paige H, Hirsch SM, Gelb MN. Effects of temporary cements on crown-to-composite resin core bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:49-52.
16. Özcan M. Fracture Strength of Ceramic-Fused-To-Metal Crowns Repaired with Two Intraoral Air-Abrasion Techniques and Some Aspects of Silane Pretreatment - A Laboratory and Clinical Study [thesis]. Cologne: University of Cologne, 1999.
17. Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I, Özcan M. Metal surface conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry. In: Mittal KL (ed). Adhesion Aspects of Polymeric Coatings, vol 2. Zeist, The Netherlands: VSP, 2003:137-149.
18. Hansson O. Strength of bond with Cospan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:248-256.
19. Özcan M, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I. A brief history and current status of metal/ceramic surface conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry. Quintessence Int 1998;29(11):713-724.
20. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Silicoating. Evaluation of a new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:171-176.
21. Chang J, Powers JM, Hart D. Bond strength of composite to alloy treated with bonding systems. J Prosthodont 1993;2:110-114.
22. Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A. Bond strengths of silicoated and acrylic resin bonding systems to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(1):1-6.
23. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:292-296.
24. Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:401-406.
25. Wood WW. Retention of posts in teeth with nonvital pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:504-506.
26. Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrofluoric degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:1248-1254.
27. Cochran M, Carlson T, Moore B, Richmond N, Brackett W. Tensile bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems. Oper Dent 1988;13:112-117.
28. International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry-Polymer-based crown and bridge materials. Amendment 1998. ISO 10477: 1992.