The Canadian Urology Fair: A model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process

Canadian Journal of Surgery

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 458-462

  Grober, Ethan D ^a,c   Matsumoto, Edward D ^a   Jewett, Michael A S ^a   Chin, Joseph L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c Univ Hlth Netwk Ctr Res Educ   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPETENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PROCESS MODEL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; UROLOGY; ABSENTEEISM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COST CONTROL; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME;

ABSENTEEISM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CANADA; COST CONTROL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERVIEWS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ONTARIO; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TIME FACTORS; UROLOGY;

EID: 0642318286     PISSN: 0008428X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Matsumoto ED, Kodama RT, Jewett MA. The Urology Fair: a residency selection process. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 2002;35:94-6.
2. Provan JL, Cuttress L. Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training. CMAJ 1995;153:919-23.
3. DaRosa DA, Folse R. Evaluation of a system designed to enhance the resident selection process. Surgery 1991;109:715-21.
4. Fine PL, Hayward RA. Do the criteria of resident selection committees predict residents' performances? Acad Med 1995;70:834-8.
5. Kron IL, Kaiser DL, Nolan SP, Rudolf LE, Muller WH Jr, Jones RS. Can success in the surgical residency be predicted from preresidency evaluation? Ann Surg 1985;202:694-5.
6. Colenbrander A. Analysis of match algorithms. Acad Med 1996;71(10 Suppl):S94-6.
7. Wagoner NE, Suriano JR, Stoner JA. Factors used by program directors to select residents. J Med Educ 1986;61:10-21.
8. Wagoner NE, Gray GT. Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical education. J Med Educ 1979;54:445-52.
9. Gong H Jr, Parker NH, Apgar FA, Shank C. Influence of the interview on ranking in the residency selection process. Med Educ 1984;18:366-9.
10. Dean RE, Dean KB, Nicholas WR, Scholten DJ. The interviewing process as it relates to the selection of candidates for general surgical residency programs. Curr Surg 1987;44:1-6.
11. Bullimore DW. Selection interviewing for medical school admission. Med Educ 1992;26:347-9.
12. Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). Post match survey of medical students graduating 2001. Available: www.carms.ca/stats/stats_index.htm (accessed 2003 Sept 29).
13. Teichman JM, Anderson KD, Dorough MM, Stein CR, Optenberg SA, Thompson IM. The urology residency matching program in practice. J Urol 2000;163:1878-87.
14. Swanson AG. The 'preresidency syndrome': an incipient epidemic of educational disruption. J Med Educ 1985;60:201-2.