Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Is it durable?

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 116, Issue 1183, 2003, Pages

  Yang, Steven ^a   Hadlow, Simon ^b  

^a AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b Taranaki Healthcare ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0642311863     PISSN: 11758716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-4.
2. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 1999;367:50-60.
3. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001;392:272-8.
4. Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 1993;286:154-9.
5. Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1988;226:14-20.
6. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop 1999;367:61-72.
7. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:373-9.
8. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM: Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:397-409.
9. Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH, Joslin CC. A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:667-72
10. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:45-9.
11. Karpman RR, Volz RG. Osteotomy versus unicompartmental prosthetic replacement in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthopaedics 1982;5:989-92.
12. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. Clin Orthop 2001;392:267-71.
13. Broughton NS, Newman JH, Bailey RA. Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 year's follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:447-52.
14. Weale AE, Newman JH. Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17- year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 1994;302:134-7.
15. Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:191-6.
16. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen D. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;392:279-82.