Afternoon mid-latitude current system and low-latitude geomagnetic field asymmetry during geomagnetic storms

Annales Geophysicae

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1537-1547

  Grafe, A ^b   Bespalov, P A ^a   Trakhtengerts, V Y ^a   Demekhov, A G ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF APPLIED PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^b GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0642311746     PISSN: 09927689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-997-1537-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baumjohann, W., Some recent progress in substorm studies, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 38, 633, 1986.
2. Clauer, C. R., R. L. McPherron, C. Searls, and M. G. Kivelson, Solar wind control of auroral zone geomagnetic activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 915, 1981.
3. Crooker, N. U., and G. L. Siscoe, Birkeland currents as the cause of the low-latitude asymmetric disturbance field, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11201, 1981.
4. Feldstein, Y. I., A. E. Levitin, V. Y. Pisarsky, N. M. Rudneva, A. Grafe, P. Ochabova, and A. Prigancova, Energy regimes in the earth's magnetosphere, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 30, 268, 1986.
5. Frank-Kamenezki, D. A., Vorlesungen über Plasmaphysik, 119, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1967.
6. Grafe, A., On the coupling of the asymmetric ring current and the eastward electrojet, Gerl. Beitr. Geophys., 86, 265, 1977.
7. Grafe, A., The explosive character of the eastward electrojet during the substorm event on April 1, 1986, Gerl. Beitr. Geophys., 99, 539, 1990.
8. Grafe, A., Freja electron precipitation as a hint for an explosive development of the eastward electrojet. In Proc. Sec. Int. Conf. Substorms, Fairbanks, Alaska, Ed. p.391, 1994.
9. Grafe, A., V. Yu. Trakhtengerts, P. A. Bespalov, and A. G. Demekhov, The evolution of the low-latitude geomagnetic storm field and the importance of turbulent diffusion for ring current particles losses, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 24689, 1996.
10. Harel, M., R. A. Wolf, R. W. Spiro, P. H. Reiff, C. K. Chen, W. J. Burke, F. J. Rich, and M. Smiddy, Quantitative simulation of a magnetospheric substorm, 2, comparison with observations, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2242, 1981.
11. Kamide, Y., The two-component auroral electrojet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 1175, 1982.
12. Kamide, Y., and N. Fukushima, Positive geomagnetic bay in evening high latitudes and their possible connection with partial ring current, Rep. Ionos. Space Res. Jap., 26, 79, 1972.
13. Kamide, Y., and J. E. Vickrey, Relative contribution of ionospheric conductivity and electric field to the auroral electrojets, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 7989, 1983.
14. Kawasaki, K., and S.-I. Akasofu, Low-latitude DS component of geomagnetic storm field, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 2396, 1971.
15. Lühr, H., S. Thürey, and N. Klöcker, The EISCAT magnetometer cross: operational aspects, first results, Geophys. Surv., 6, 305, 1984.
16. Pytte, T., R. L. McPherron, E. W. Hones, and H. I. West, Multiple satellite studies of magnetic substorms. Distinction between polar magnetic substorms and convection-driven negative bays, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 663, 1978.
17. Sergeev, V. A., On the classification of magnetospheric phenomena, Phys. Solariterr., 4, 19, 1977.
18. Williams, D. J., Ring current composition and sources: an update, Planet. Space Sci., 11, 1195, 1981.