Are specialty society-based treatment guidelines still relevant?

Spine Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 91-92

  Wong, David A ^a  

^a Denver Orthopedic Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

CLINICAL STUDY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SPINE DISEASE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; STANDARD;

HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 0642310759     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00596-X     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Rahman M. Pukui T. A decline in the U.S. share of research articles N Engl J Med 347 2002 1211-1212
2. Wong D.A. Developing treatment guidelines. In: Mayer T. Gatchel R. Polatin P. (Eds.), Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: functions, outcomes and evidence 2002 721-727 Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia
3. Sackett D.L. Straus S.E. Richardson W.S. et al. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM 2nd ed 2000 Churchill Livingstone London
4. Osen O. Gotsche P.C. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography Lancet 358 2001 1340-1342
5. Horton R. Screening mammography: an overview revisited Lancet 358 2001 1284-1285
6. Miller A.B. Correspondence: screening for breast cancer with mammography Lancet 358 2001 2164